The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Closed Form Solution to Natural Image Matting
Abstract
Interactive digital matting, the process of extracting a foreground object from an image based on limited user input, is an important task in image and video editing. From a computer vision perspective, this task is extremely challenging because it is massively ill-posed - at each pixel we must estimate the foreground and the background colors, as well as the foreground opacity ("alpha matte") from a single color measurement. Current approaches either restrict the estimation to a small part of the image, estimating foreground and background colors based on nearby pixels where they are known, or perform iterative nonlinear estimation by alternating foreground and background color estimation with alpha estimation. In this paper we present a closed form solution to natural image matting. We derive a cost function from local smoothness assumptions on foreground and background colors, and show that in the resulting expression it is possible to analytically eliminate the foreground and background colors to obtain a quadratic cost function in alpha. This allows us to find the globally optimal alpha matte by solving a sparse linear system of equations. Furthermore, the closed form formula allows us to predict the properties of the solution by analyzing the eigenvectors of a sparse matrix, closely related to matrices used in spectral image segmentation algorithms. We show that high quality mattes can be obtained on natural images from a surprisingly small amount of user input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single image haze removal using dark channel prior
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.168 · Cited by 7,601
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.213 · Cited by 5,546
ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation
Lin, D., Dai, J., Jia, J., He, K., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.344 · Cited by 1,129
A Geodesic Framework for Fast Interactive Image and Video Segmentation and Matting
Bai, X., & Sapiro, G. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408931 · Cited by 438
A global sampling method for alpha matting
He, K., Rhemann, C., Rother, C., Tang, X., & Sun, J. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995495 · Cited by 310
Spectral Unmixing via Data-Guided Sparsity
Zhu, F., Wang, Y., Fan, B., Xiang, S., Meng, G., & Pan, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2363423 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, A., Lischinski, D., & Weiss, Y.
- Venue
- 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-07-10
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 61-68
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167897892
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.60
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.