The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Object Tracking Through Simultaneous Long Occlusions and Split-Merge Conditions
Abstract
A fundamental requirement for effective automated analysis of object behavior and interactions in video is that each object must be consistently identified over time. This is difficult when the objects are often occluded for long periods: nearly all tracking algorithms will terminate a track with loss of identity on a long gap. The problem is further confounded by objects in close proximity, tracking failures due to shadows, etc. Recently, some work has been done to address these issues using higher level reasoning, by linking tracks from multiple objects over long gaps. However, these efforts have assumed a one-to-one correspondence between tracks on either side of the gap. This is often not true in real scenarios of interest, where the objects are closely spaced and dynamically occlude each other, causing trackers to merge objects into single tracks. In this paper, we show how to efficiently handle splitting and merging during track linking. Moreover, we show that we can maintain the identities of objects that merge together and subsequently split. This enables the identity of objects to be maintained throughout long sequences with difficult conditions. We demonstrate our approach on a highly challenging, oblique-view video sequence of dense traffic of a highway interchange. We successfully track the large majority of the hundreds of moving vehicles in the scene, many in close proximity, through long occlusions and shadows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simple online and realtime tracking
Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., & Upcroft, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7533003 · Cited by 4,433
StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Again
Du, Y., Zhao, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, Y., Su, F., Gong, T., & Meng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3240881 · Cited by 1,191
“Linear interpolation is widely used to fill the gaps in recovered trajectories for missing detections [36, 22, 33, 37, 63, 11].”
Multiple Object Tracking Using K-Shortest Paths Optimization
Berclaz, J., Fleuret, F., Turetken, E., & Fua, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.21 · Cited by 1,015
Globally-optimal greedy algorithms for tracking a variable number of objects
Pirsiavash, H., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. C. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995604 · Cited by 790
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene
Li, Y., Huang, C., & Nevatia, R. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206735 · Cited by 633
Metadata
- Authors
- Perera, A. G. A., Srinivas, C., Hoogs, A., Brooksby, G., & Hu, W.
- Venue
- 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-07-10
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 666-673
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120079785
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Object Tracking Through Simultaneous Long Occlusions and Split-Merge Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2006.195
- The paper
- Perera, A. G. A., Srinivas, C., Hoogs, A., Brooksby, G., & Hu, W. (2006). Multi-Object Tracking Through Simultaneous Long Occlusions and Split-Merge Conditions. 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2006.195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.