The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Lagrangian Particle Dynamics Approach for Crowd Flow Segmentation and Stability Analysis
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a framework in which Lagrangian particle dynamics is used for the segmentation of high density crowd flows and detection of flow instabilities. For this purpose, a flow field generated by a moving crowd is treated as an aperiodic dynamical system. A grid of particles is overlaid on the flow field, and is advected using a numerical integration scheme. The evolution of particles through the flow is tracked using a flow map, whose spatial gradients are subsequently used to setup a Cauchy Green deformation tensor for quantifying the amount by which the neighboring particles have diverged over the length of the integration. The maximum eigenvalue of the tensor is used to construct a finite time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) field, which reveals the Lagrangian coherent structures (LCS) present in the underlying flow. The LCS divide flow into regions of qualitatively different dynamics and are used to locate boundaries of the flow segments in a normalized cuts framework. Any change in the number of flow segments over time is regarded as an instability, which is detected by establishing correspondences between flow segments over time. The experiments are conducted on a challenging set of videos taken from Google Video and a National Geographic documentary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localization
Wang, Q., Gao, J., Lin, W., & Li, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3013269 · Cited by 510
A survey of video datasets for human action and activity recognition
Chaquet, J. M., Carmona, E. J., & Fernández-Caballero, A. (2013) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2013.01.013 · Cited by 455
Floor Fields for Tracking in High Density Crowd Scenes
Ali, S., & Shah, M. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_1 · Cited by 388
Self-citationCrowd Analysis Using Computer Vision Techniques
Silveira Jacques Junior, J., Musse, S., & Jung, C. (2010) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2010.937394 · Cited by 343
A comprehensive review on deep learning-based methods for video anomaly detection
Nayak, R., Pati, U. C., & Das, S. K. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104078 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali, S., & Shah, M.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007-06
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108404684
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Lagrangian Particle Dynamics Approach for Crowd Flow Segmentation and Stability Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2007.382977
- The paper
- Ali, S., & Shah, M. (2007). A Lagrangian Particle Dynamics Approach for Crowd Flow Segmentation and Stability Analysis. 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2007.382977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.