Cited by 510Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFace recognition and analysis

NWPU-Crowd: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Crowd Counting and Localization

Open access
Wang, Qi, Gao, Junyu, Lin, Wei, Li, Xuelong·2021·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

In the last decade, crowd counting and localization attract much attention of researchers due to its wide-spread applications, including crowd monitoring, public safety, space design, etc. Many convolutional neural networks (CNN) are designed for tackling this task. However, currently released datasets are so small-scale that they can not meet the needs of the supervised CNN-based algorithms. To remedy this problem, we construct a large-scale congested crowd counting and localization dataset, NWPU-Crowd, consisting of 5,109 images, in a total of 2,133,375 annotated heads with points and boxes. Compared with other real-world datasets, it contains various illumination scenes and has the largest density range ( 0 ∼ 20,033). Besides, a benchmark website is developed for impartially evaluating the different methods, which allows researchers to submit the results of the test set. Based on the proposed dataset, we further describe the data characteristics, evaluate the performance of some mainstream state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, and analyze the new problems that arise on the new data. What's more, the benchmark is deployed at https://www.crowdbenchmark.com/, and the dataset/code/models/results are available at https://gjy3035.github.io/NWPU-Crowd-Sample-Code/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2020.3013269

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38][38] W. Liu, M. Salzmann, and P. Fua, 'Context-aware crowd counting,' in Proc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. , 2019, pp. 5099-5108. -

Authors
Wang, Q., Gao, J., Lin, W., & Li, X.
Affiliations
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
2141-2149
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W3027606690
Cited by
510
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
26.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB1002202)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1864204, 61773316, U1801262, 61871470)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
crowd counting, crowd localization, large-scale datasets, head detection, crowd monitoring, illumination variation, crowd density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review