The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An efficient algorithm for compressed MR imaging using total variation and wavelets
Abstract
Compressed sensing, an emerging multidisciplinary field involving mathematics, probability, optimization, and signal processing, focuses on reconstructing an unknown signal from a very limited number of samples. Because information such as boundaries of organs is very sparse in most MR images, compressed sensing makes it possible to reconstruct the same MR image from a very limited set of measurements significantly reducing the MRI scan duration. In order to do that however, one has to solve the difficult problem of minimizing nonsmooth functions on large data sets. To handle this, we propose an efficient algorithm that jointly minimizes the ℓ1norm, total variation, and a least squares measure, one of the most powerful models for compressive MR imaging. Our algorithm is based upon an iterative operator-splitting framework. The calculations are accelerated by continuation and takes advantage of fast wavelet and Fourier transforms enabling our code to process MR images from actual real life applications. We show that faithful MR images can be reconstructed from a subset that represents a mere 20 percent of the complete set of measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
(2021) · A First Course in Statistical Programming with R · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 13,724
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?
Candes, E. J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.885507 · Cited by 6,839
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ 1 minimization
Donoho, D. L., & Elad, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0437847100 · Cited by 2,898
Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems
Natarajan, B. K. (1995) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539792240406 · Cited by 2,783
Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting
Combettes, P. L., & Wajs, V. R. (2005) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/050626090 · Cited by 2,678
Cited by
Guo, P., Wang, P., Zhou, J., Jiang, S., & Patel, V. M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00245 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, S., Yin, W., Zhang, Y., & Chakraborty, A.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167396304
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 27.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficient algorithm for compressed MR imaging using total variation and wavelets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587391
- The paper
- Ma, S., Yin, W., Zhang, Y., & Chakraborty, A. (2008). An efficient algorithm for compressed MR imaging using total variation and wavelets. 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.