Cited by 65Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Vision and ImagingAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

Information-theoretic active scene exploration

Sommerlade, Eric, Reid, Ian·2008·2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Studies support the need for high resolution imagery to identify persons in surveillance videos. However, the use of telephoto lenses sacrifices a wider field of view and thereby increases the uncertainty of other, possibly more interesting events in the scene. Using zoom lenses offers the possibility of enjoying the benefits of both wide field of view and high resolution, but not simultaneously. We approach this problem of balancing these finite imaging resources - or of exploration vs exploitation - using an information-theoretic approach. We argue that the camera parameters - pan, tilt and zoom - should be set to maximise information gain, or equivalently minimising conditional entropy of the scene model, comprised of multiple targets and a yet unobserved one. The information content of the former is supplied directly by the uncertainties computed using a Kalman filter tracker, while the latter is modelled using a rdquobackgroundrdquo Poisson process whose parameters are learned from extended scene observations; together these yield an entropy for the scene. We support our argument with quantitative and qualitative analyses in simulated and real-world environments, demonstrating that this approach yields sensible exploration behaviours in which the camera alternates between obtaining close-up views of the targets while paying attention to the background, especially to areas of known high activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587522

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sommerlade, E., & Reid, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-06
Pages
1-7
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125438290
Cited by
65
References
20
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
information gain, conditional entropy, zoom lens, surveillance video, personal identification, exploration-exploitation balance, Kalman filter tracking, multi-target tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review