The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require?
Abstract
Visual recognition of human actions in video clips has been an active field of research in recent years. However, most published methods either analyse an entire video and assign it a single action label, or use relatively large look-ahead to classify each frame. Contrary to these strategies, human vision proves that simple actions can be recognised almost instantaneously. In this paper, we present a system for action recognition from very short sequences (ldquosnippetsrdquo) of 1-10 frames, and systematically evaluate it on standard data sets. It turns out that even local shape and optic flow for a single frame are enough to achieve ap90% correct recognitions, and snippets of 5-7 frames (0.3-0.5 seconds of video) are enough to achieve a performance similar to the one obtainable with the entire video sequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements
Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1057 · Cited by 955
Cited by
Hmdb: a large video database for human motion recognition
Kuehne, H., Jhuang, H., Garrote, E., Poggio, T., & Serre, T. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126543 · Cited by 3,965
A survey on vision-based human action recognition
Poppe, R. (2010) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,242
Slow feature analysis for human action recognition
Zhang, Z., & Tao, D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.157 · Cited by 307
Facial Expression Recognition Using Facial Movement Features
Zhang, L., & Tjondronegoro, D. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.13 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Schindler, K., & van Gool, L.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136853139
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 33.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587730
- The paper
- Schindler, K., & van Gool, L. (2008). Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require? 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
