Cited by 2,242Human Pose and Action RecognitionHand Gesture Recognition SystemsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

A survey on vision-based human action recognition

Poppe, Ronald·2010·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2009.11.014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poppe, R.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Poppe, Ronald
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
976-990
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106996050
Cited by
2,242
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 157 · 2018: 168 · 2017: 210 · 2016: 199 · 2015: 206 · 2014: 219 · 2013: 169 · 2012: 147
FWCI
92.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
human action recognition, video action recognition, visual surveillance, video retrieval, human-computer interaction, image representation, video classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review