Cited by 144Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Transformation of General Binary MRF Minimization to the First-Order Case

Ishikawa, H·2011·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

We introduce a transformation of general higher-order Markov random field with binary labels into a first-order one that has the same minima as the original. Moreover, we formalize a framework for approximately minimizing higher-order multi-label MRF energies that combines the new reduction with the fusion-move and QPBO algorithms. While many computer vision problems today are formulated as energy minimization problems, they have mostly been limited to using first-order energies, which consist of unary and pairwise clique potentials, with a few exceptions that consider triples. This is because of the lack of efficient algorithms to optimize energies with higher-order interactions. Our algorithm challenges this restriction that limits the representational power of the models so that higher-order energies can be used to capture the rich statistics of natural scenes. We also show that some minimization methods can be considered special cases of the present framework, as well as comparing the new method experimentally with other such techniques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2010.91

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potentially large overhead in the number of variables lead to the development of several methods for degree reduction.

    “The potentially large overhead in the number of variables lead to the development of several methods for degree reduction (e.g., References [160, 167, 168, 180, 188])”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ishikawa, H.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishikawa, H
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2011-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1234-1249
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
OpenAlex
W2124558257
Cited by
144
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
Markov random fields, higher-order interactions, approximate optimization
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Image Enhancement, Markov Chains, Pattern Recognition, Automated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review