The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning appearance in virtual scenarios for pedestrian detection
Abstract
Detecting pedestrians in images is a key functionality to avoid vehicle-to-pedestrian collisions. The most promising detectors rely on appearance-based pedestrian classifiers trained with labelled samples. This paper addresses the following question: can a pedestrian appearance model learnt in virtual scenarios work successfully for pedestrian detection in real images? (Fig. 1). Our experiments suggest a positive answer, which is a new and relevant conclusion for research in pedestrian detection. More specifically, we record training sequences in virtual scenarios and then appearance-based pedestrian classifiers are learnt using HOG and linear SVM. We test such classifiers in a publicly available dataset provided by Daimler AG for pedestrian detection benchmarking. This dataset contains real world images acquired from a moving car. The obtained result is compared with the one given by a classifier learnt using samples coming from real images. The comparison reveals that, although virtual samples were not specially selected, both virtual and real based training give rise to classifiers of similar performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Cited by
Ros, G., Sellart, L., Materzynska, J., Vazquez, D., & Lopez, A. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.352 · Cited by 2,338
VirtualWorlds as Proxy for Multi-object Tracking Analysis
Gaidon, A., Wang, Q., Cabon, Y., & Vig, E. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.470 · Cited by 1,079
Synthetic Data for Deep Learning
Nikolenko, S. I. (2021) · Springer Optimization and Its Applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75178-4 · Cited by 423
Expecting the Unexpected: Training Detectors for Unusual Pedestrians with Adversarial Imposters
Huang, S., & Ramanan, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.496 · Cited by 49
Pedestrian Detection Using Image Fusion and Stereo Vision in Autonomous Vehicles
shakeri, A., Moshiri, B., & Garakani, H. G. (2018) · 2018 9th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST) · doi:10.1109/istel.2018.8661069 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Marin, J., Vazquez, D., Geronimo, D., & Lopez, A. M.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153062878
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning appearance in virtual scenarios for pedestrian detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540218
- The paper
- Marin, J., Vazquez, D., Geronimo, D., & Lopez, A. M. (2010). Learning appearance in virtual scenarios for pedestrian detection. 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.