Expecting the Unexpected: Training Detectors for Unusual Pedestrians with Adversarial Imposters
Open accessAbstract
As autonomous vehicles become an every-day reality, high-accuracy pedestrian detection is of paramount practical importance. Pedestrian detection is a highly researched topic with mature methods, but most datasets (for both training and evaluation) focus on common scenes of people engaged in typical walking poses on sidewalks. But performance is most crucial for dangerous scenarios that are rarely observed, such as children playing in the street and people using bicycles/skateboards in unexpected ways. Such in-the-tail data is notoriously hard to observe, making both training and testing difficult. To analyze this problem, we have collected a novel annotated dataset of dangerous scenarios called the Precarious Pedestrian dataset. Even given a dedicated collection effort, it is relatively small by contemporary standards (≈ 1000 images). To explore large-scale data-driven learning, we explore the use of synthetic data generated by a game engine. A significant challenge is selected the right priors or parameters for synthesis: we would like realistic data with realistic poses and object configurations. Inspired by Generative Adversarial Networks, we generate a massive amount of synthetic data and train a discriminative classifier to select a realistic subset (that fools the classifier), which we deem Synthetic Imposters. We demonstrate that this pipeline allows one to generate realistic (or adverserial) training data by making use of rendering/animation engines. Interestingly, we also demonstrate that such data can be used to rank algorithms, suggesting that Synthetic Imposters can also be used for in-the-tail validation at test-time, a notoriously difficult challenge for real-world deployment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many recent pedestrian detection methods are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.
“Many recent pedestrian detection methods [62], [63], [71], [55], [70], [57], [56] are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.”
From EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes (2019) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Hazirbas, C., Golkov, V., Smagt, P. V. D., Cremers, D., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.316 · Cited by 4,313 · see citing works
An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection
Lienhart, R., & Maydt, J. (2003) · Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2002.1038171 · Cited by 2,977 · cited 1× · see citing works
“HARR+Cascade: A cascade of boosted classifiers working with haar-like features[47, 25].”
BackgroundRos, G., Sellart, L., Materzynska, J., Vazquez, D., & Lopez, A. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.352 · Cited by 2,338 · see citing works
Unsupervised feature learning for 3D scene labeling
Lai, K., Bo, L., & Fox, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907298 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes
Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2897684 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, S., & Ramanan, D.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 4664-4673
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2608461606
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- pedestrian detection, autonomous vehicles, synthetic data generation, game engine rendering, generative adversarial networks, algorithm ranking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review