The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grouplet: A structured image representation for recognizing human and object interactions
Abstract
Psychologists have proposed that many human-object interaction activities form unique classes of scenes. Recognizing these scenes is important for many social functions. To enable a computer to do this is however a challenging task. Take people-playing-musical-instrument (PPMI) as an example; to distinguish a person playing violin from a person just holding a violin requires subtle distinction of characteristic image features and feature arrangements that differentiate these two scenes. Most of the existing image representation methods are either too coarse (e.g. BoW) or too sparse (e.g. constellation models) for performing this task. In this paper, we propose a new image feature representation called “grouplet”. The grouplet captures the structured information of an image by encoding a number of discriminative visual features and their spatial configurations. Using a dataset of 7 different PPMI activities, we show that grouplets are more effective in classifying and detecting human-object interactions than other state-of-the-art methods. In particular, our method can make a robust distinction between humans playing the instruments and humans co-occurring with the instruments without playing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2005.09.012 · Cited by 2,359
Self-citation
Cited by
Hmdb: a large video database for human motion recognition
Kuehne, H., Jhuang, H., Garrote, E., Poggio, T., & Serre, T. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126543 · Cited by 3,965
From action to activity: Sensor-based activity recognition
Liu, Y., Nie, L., Liu, L., & Rosenblum, D. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.096 · Cited by 486
Grounded Human-Object Interaction Hotspots From Video
Nagarajan, T., Feichtenhofer, C., & Grauman, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00878 · Cited by 147
Dual Graph Convolutional Networks with Transformer and Curriculum Learning for Image Captioning
Dong, X., Long, C., Xu, W., & Xiao, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3474085.3475439 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, B., & Fei-Fei, L.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-06
- Pages
- 9-16
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050964073
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.