The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model
Abstract
Sparse representation has been applied to visual tracking by finding the best candidate with minimal reconstruction error using target templates. However most sparse representation based trackers only consider the holistic representation and do not make full use of the sparse coefficients to discriminate between the target and the background, and hence may fail with more possibility when there is similar object or occlusion in the scene. In this paper we develop a simple yet robust tracking method based on the structural local sparse appearance model. This representation exploits both partial information and spatial information of the target based on a novel alignment-pooling method. The similarity obtained by pooling across the local patches helps not only locate the target more accurately but also handle occlusion. In addition, we employ a template update strategy which combines incremental subspace learning and sparse representation. This strategy adapts the template to the appearance change of the target with less possibility of drifting and reduces the influence of the occluded target template as well. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations on challenging benchmark image sequences demonstrate that the proposed tracking algorithm performs favorably against several state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking
Ross, D. A., Lim, J., Lin, R.-S., & Yang, M.-H. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0075-7 · Cited by 3,061
Self-citation
Cited by
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Self-citationWu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2388226 · Cited by 3,371
Self-citationAccurate Scale Estimation for Robust Visual Tracking
Danelljan, M., Häger, G., Shahbaz Khan, F., & Felsberg, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 · doi:10.5244/c.28.65 · Cited by 2,087
A Benchmark and Simulator for UAV Tracking
Mueller, M., Smith, N., & Ghanem, B. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_27 · Cited by 1,944
Beyond Correlation Filters: Learning Continuous Convolution Operators for Visual Tracking
Danelljan, M., Robinson, A., Shahbaz Khan, F., & Felsberg, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46454-1_29 · Cited by 1,853
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, X., Lu, H., & Yang, M.-H.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 1822-1829
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162383208
- Cited by
- 1,188
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 80.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247880
- The paper
- Jia, X., Lu, H., & Yang, M.-H. (2012). Visual tracking via adaptive structural local sparse appearance model. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.