Cited by 81Human Pose and Action RecognitionVideo Analysis and SummarizationMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Temporal Sequence Modeling for Video Event Detection

Cheng, Yu, Fan, Quanfu, Pankanti, Sharath, Choudhary, Alok·2014·2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We present a novel approach for event detection in video by temporal sequence modeling. Exploiting temporal information has lain at the core of many approaches for video analysis (i.e., action, activity and event recognition). Unlike previous works doing temporal modeling at semantic event level, we propose to model temporal dependencies in the data at sub-event level without using event annotations. This frees our model from ground truth and addresses several limitations in previous work on temporal modeling. Based on this idea, we represent a video by a sequence of visual words learnt from the video, and apply the Sequence Memoizer [21] to capture long-range dependencies in a temporal context in the visual sequence. This data-driven temporal model is further integrated with event classification for jointly performing segmentation and classification of events in a video. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on two challenging datasets for visual recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2014.286

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results on 50Salads, GTEA, and the Breakfast dataset.

    “Our model achieves state-of-the-art results on three challenging datasets: 50Salads, Georgia Tech Egocentric Activities (GTEA), and the Breakfast dataset.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, Y., Fan, Q., Pankanti, S., & Choudhary, A.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-06
Pages
2235-2242
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083319857
Cited by
80
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
video event detection, temporal sequence modeling, visual words, long-range temporal dependencies, event segmentation, event classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review