The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing
Abstract
Haze is one of the major factors that degrade outdoor images. Removing haze from a single image is known to be severely ill-posed, and assumptions made in previous methods do not hold in many situations. In this paper, we systematically investigate different haze-relevant features in a learning framework to identify the best feature combination for image dehazing. We show that the dark-channel feature is the most informative one for this task, which confirms the observation of He et al. [8] from a learning perspective, while other haze-relevant features also contribute significantly in a complementary way. We also find that surprisingly, the synthetic hazy image patches we use for feature investigation serve well as training data for realworld images, which allows us to train specific models for specific applications. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.213 · Cited by 5,546
Cited by
DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removal
Cai, B., Xu, X., Jia, K., Qing, C., & Tao, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2016.2598681 · Cited by 3,367
Berman, D., Treibitz, T., & Avidan, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.185 · Cited by 1,642
NH-HAZE: An Image Dehazing Benchmark with Non-Homogeneous Hazy and Haze-Free Images
Ancuti, C. O., Ancuti, C., & Timofte, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00230 · Cited by 517
“Most of the early single image dehazing methods solve the optical model of Koschmieder [26] by searching for different priors that capture statistical properties of the hazy and non-hazy images [20, 38, 24, 40, 27, 10, 1, 21, 19, 39].”
BackgroundFAMED-Net: A Fast and Accurate Multi-Scale End-to-End Dehazing Network
Zhang, J., & Tao, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2019.2922837 · Cited by 196
DRCDN: learning deep residual convolutional dehazing networks
Zhang, S., & He, F. (2020) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-019-01774-8 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, K., Yang, J., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-06
- Pages
- 2995-3002
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065002911
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2014.383
- The paper
- Tang, K., Yang, J., & Wang, J. (2014). Investigating Haze-Relevant Features in a Learning Framework for Image Dehazing. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2014.383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.