Cited by 3,367Image Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising Methods

DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removal

Open access
Cai, Bolun, Xu, Xiangmin, Jia, Kui, Qing, Chunmei, Tao, Dacheng·2016·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Single image haze removal is a challenging ill-posed problem. Existing methods use various constraints/priors to get plausible dehazing solutions. The key to achieve haze removal is to estimate a medium transmission map for an input hazy image. In this paper, we propose a trainable end-to-end system called DehazeNet, for medium transmission estimation. DehazeNet takes a hazy image as input, and outputs its medium transmission map that is subsequently used to recover a haze-free image via atmospheric scattering model. DehazeNet adopts convolutional neural network-based deep architecture, whose layers are specially designed to embody the established assumptions/priors in image dehazing. Specifically, the layers of Maxout units are used for feature extraction, which can generate almost all haze-relevant features. We also propose a novel nonlinear activation function in DehazeNet, called bilateral rectified linear unit, which is able to improve the quality of recovered haze-free image. We establish connections between the components of the proposed DehazeNet and those used in existing methods. Experiments on benchmark images show that DehazeNet achieves superior performance over existing methods, yet keeps efficient and easy to use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2016.2598681

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, B., Xu, X., Jia, K., Qing, C., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2016-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
5187-5198
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2256362396
Cited by
3,367
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 319 · 2025: 463 · 2024: 500 · 2023: 442 · 2022: 410 · 2021: 393 · 2020: 313 · 2019: 257 · 2018: 193 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
119.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Founding of China (61171142, 61401163)
  • Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China (2011A010801005, 2014B010111003, 2014B010111006)
  • Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Body Data Science (201605030011)
  • Australian Research Council Projects (FT-130101457, DP-140102164, LE-140100061)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
single image dehazing, atmospheric scattering model, end-to-end neural network, nonlinear activation functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review