The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep multiple instance learning for image classification and auto-annotation
Abstract
The recent development in learning deep representations has demonstrated its wide applications in traditional vision tasks like classification and detection. However, there has been little investigation on how we could build up a deep learning framework in a weakly supervised setting. In this paper, we attempt to model deep learning in a weakly supervised learning (multiple instance learning) framework. In our setting, each image follows a dual multi-instance assumption, where its object proposals and possible text annotations can be regarded as two instance sets. We thus design effective systems to exploit the MIL property with deep learning strategies from the two ends; we also try to jointly learn the relationship between object and annotation proposals. We conduct extensive experiments and prove that our weakly supervised deep learning framework not only achieves convincing performance in vision tasks including classification and image annotation, but also extracts reasonable region-keyword pairs with little supervision, on both widely used benchmarks like PASCAL VOC and MIT Indoor Scene 67, and also a dataset for image-and patch-level annotations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354
Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach
Hou, X., & Zhang, L. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383267 · Cited by 3,422
Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles
Dietterich, T. G., Lathrop, R. H., & Lozano-Pérez, T. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00034-3 · Cited by 2,866
Lee, H., Grosse, R., Ranganath, R., & Ng, A. Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553453 · Cited by 2,412
The PASCAL visual object classes challenge 2006 (VOC2006) results
Everingham, M., Zisserman, A., Williams, C. K. I., & Gool, L. V. (2006) · Cited by 2,079
Cited by
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Rawat, W., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00990 · Cited by 3,503
Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7 · Cited by 793
Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications
Carbonneau, M.-A., Cheplygina, V., Granger, E., & Gagnon, G. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.009 · Cited by 740
“The weak supervision can come from description sentences [103–105], web search engine results [106], tags associated with similar images and words found on web pages associated with the images [2].”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Object Localization and Detection: A Survey
Zhang, D., Han, J., Cheng, G., & Yang, M.-H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3074313 · Cited by 277
Object Detection from the Video Taken by Drone via Convolutional Neural Networks
Sun, C., Zhan, W., She, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/4013647 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J., Yu, Y., Huang, C., & Yu, K.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-06
- Pages
- 3460-3469
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1938425378
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep multiple instance learning for image classification and auto-annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298968
- The paper
- Wu, J., Yu, Y., Huang, C., & Yu, K. (2015). Deep multiple instance learning for image classification and auto-annotation. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
