The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contour Detection in Unstructured 3D Point Clouds
Abstract
We describe a method to automatically detect contours, i.e. lines along which the surface orientation sharply changes, in large-scale outdoor point clouds. Contours are important intermediate features for structuring point clouds and converting them into high-quality surface or solid models, and are extensively used in graphics and mapping applications. Yet, detecting them in unstructured, inhomogeneous point clouds turns out to be surprisingly difficult, and existing line detection algorithms largely fail. We approach contour extraction as a two-stage discriminative learning problem. In the first stage, a contour score for each individual point is predicted with a binary classifier, using a set of features extracted from the point's neighborhood. The contour scores serve as a basis to construct an overcomplete graph of candidate contours. The second stage selects an optimal set of contours from the candidates. This amounts to a further binary classification in a higher-order MRF, whose cliques encode a preference for connected contours and penalize loose ends. The method can handle point clouds > 107 points in a couple of minutes, and vastly outperforms a baseline that performs Canny-style edge detection on a range image representation of the point cloud.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts
Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.993558 · Cited by 6,306
Cited by
FoldingNet: Point Cloud Auto-Encoder via Deep Grid Deformation
Yang, Y., Feng, C., Shen, Y., & Tian, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00029 · Cited by 1,313
A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentation
García-García, A., Orts‐Escolano, S., Oprea, S., Villena-Martínez, V., & García‐Rodríguez, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.06857 · Cited by 991
Rakha, T., & Gorodetsky, A. (2018) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.002 · Cited by 470
FAST SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION OF 3D POINT CLOUDS WITH STRONGLY VARYING DENSITY
Hackel, T., Wegner, J. D., & Schindler, K. (2016) · ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences · doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-iii-3-177-2016 · Cited by 371
Self-citation3D Point Cloud Generative Adversarial Network Based on Tree Structured Graph Convolutions
Shu, D., Park, S. W., & Kwon, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00396 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackel, T., Wegner, J. D., & Schindler, K.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 1610-1618
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2467615243
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contour Detection in Unstructured 3D Point Clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2016.178
- The paper
- Hackel, T., Wegner, J. D., & Schindler, K. (2016). Contour Detection in Unstructured 3D Point Clouds. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2016.178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.