Cited by 530Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Vision and ImagingRobot Manipulation and Learning

Uncertainty-Driven 6D Pose Estimation of Objects and Scenes from a Single RGB Image

Brachmann, Eric, Michel, Frank, Krull, Alexander, Yang, Michael Ying, Gumhold, Stefan, Rother, Carsten·2016·2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In recent years, the task of estimating the 6D pose of object instances and complete scenes, i.e. camera localization, from a single input image has received considerable attention. Consumer RGB-D cameras have made this feasible, even for difficult, texture-less objects and scenes. In this work, we show that a single RGB image is sufficient to achieve visually convincing results. Our key concept is to model and exploit the uncertainty of the system at all stages of the processing pipeline. The uncertainty comes in the form of continuous distributions over 3D object coordinates and discrete distributions over object labels. We give three technical contributions. Firstly, we develop a regularized, auto-context regression framework which iteratively reduces uncertainty in object coordinate and object label predictions. Secondly, we introduce an efficient way to marginalize object coordinate distributions over depth. This is necessary to deal with missing depth information. Thirdly, we utilize the distributions over object labels to detect multiple objects simultaneously with a fixed budget of RANSAC hypotheses. We tested our system for object pose estimation and camera localization on commonly used data sets. We see a major improvement over competing systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2016.366

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reprojection error and average distance error have the disadvantage that orientation and position sensitivity is dependent on the choice of keypoints.

    “Both have the disadvantage that the orientation and position sensitivity is dependent on the choice of keypoints, since the slope of orientation error is proportional to the distance of the keypoints from the origin of the target's body frame.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brachmann, E., Michel, F., Krull, A., Yang, M. Y., Gumhold, S., & Rother, C.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Venue
2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-06
Pages
3364-3372
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472269674
Cited by
530
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 5
FWCI
93.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
6D pose estimation, single RGB image, uncertainty modeling, visual localization, textureless objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review