The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploit Bounding Box Annotations for Multi-Label Object Recognition
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown great performance as general feature representations for object recognition applications. However, for multi-label images that contain multiple objects from different categories, scales and locations, global CNN features are not optimal. In this paper, we incorporate local information to enhance the feature discriminative power. In particular, we first extract object proposals from each image. With each image treated as a bag and object proposals extracted from it treated as instances, we transform the multi-label recognition problem into a multi-class multi-instance learning problem. Then, in addition to extracting the typical CNN feature representation from each proposal, we propose to make use of ground-truth bounding box annotations (strong labels) to add another level of local information by using nearest-neighbor relationships of local regions to form a multi-view pipeline. The proposed multi-view multiinstance framework utilizes both weak and strong labels effectively, and more importantly it has the generalization ability to even boost the performance of unseen categories by partial strong labels from other categories. Our framework is extensively compared with state-of-the-art handcrafted feature based methods and CNN based methods on two multi-label benchmark datasets. The experimental results validate the discriminative power and the generalization ability of the proposed framework. With strong labels, our framework is able to achieve state-of-the-art results in both datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Oquab, M., Bottou, L., Laptev, I., & Sivic, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.222 · Cited by 3,150 · cited 8×
“To address the problems with global CNN representations, following the recent works [19, 26, 18, 12], we incorporate local information via extracting object proposals using general object detection techniques such as selective search [25] for multi-label object recognition.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImage Classification with the Fisher Vector: Theory and Practice
Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F., Mensink, T., & Verbeek, J. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0636-x · Cited by 1,498
CNN: Single-label to Multi-label
Wei, Y., Xia, W., Huang, J., Ni, B., Dong, J., Zhao, Y., & Yan, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.5726 · Cited by 784
How good are detection proposals, really?
Hosang, J., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014 · doi:10.5244/c.28.24 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Deep Label Distribution Learning With Label Ambiguity
Gao, B.-B., Xing, C., Xie, C.-W., Wu, J., & Geng, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2689998 · Cited by 508
Self-citationMulti-label Image Recognition by Recurrently Discovering Attentional Regions
Wang, Z., Chen, T., Li, G., Xu, R., & Lin, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.58 · Cited by 326
A Novel Deep Learning Model for Detection of Severity Level of the Disease in Citrus Fruits
Dhiman, P., Kukreja, V., Manoharan, P., Kaur, A., Kamruzzaman, M. M., Dhaou, I. B., & Iwendi, C. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11030495 · Cited by 308
Elucidating image-to-set prediction: An analysis of models, losses and datasets
Pineda, L., Salvador, A., Drozdzal, M., & Romero, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.05709 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, H., Zhou, J. T., Zhang, Y., Gao, B.-B., Wu, J., & Cai, J.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 280-288
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2410641892
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.