The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Label Distribution Learning With Label Ambiguity
Open accessAbstract
Convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) have achieved excellent recognition performance in various visual recognition tasks. A large labeled training set is one of the most important factors for its success. However, it is difficult to collect sufficient training images with precise labels in some domains, such as apparent age estimation, head pose estimation, multilabel classification, and semantic segmentation. Fortunately, there is ambiguous information among labels, which makes these tasks different from traditional classification. Based on this observation, we convert the label of each image into a discrete label distribution, and learn the label distribution by minimizing a Kullback-Leibler divergence between the predicted and ground-truth label distributions using deep ConvNets. The proposed deep label distribution learning (DLDL) method effectively utilizes the label ambiguity in both feature learning and classifier learning, which help prevent the network from overfitting even when the training set is small. Experimental results show that the proposed approach produces significantly better results than the state-of-the-art methods for age estimation and head pose estimation. At the same time, it also improves recognition performance for multi-label classification and semantic segmentation tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839
Cited by
Uncertainty-Aware Score Distribution Learning for Action Quality Assessment
Tang, Y., Ni, Z., Zhou, J., Zhang, D., Lu, J., Wu, Y., & Zhou, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00986 · Cited by 209
Deep Differentiable Random Forests for Age Estimation
Shen, W., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, K., Wang, B., & Yuille, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2937294 · Cited by 91
Liao, Z., Girgis, H., Abdi, A., Vaseli, H., Hetherington, J., Rohling, R., Gin, K., Tsang, T., & Abolmaesumi, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2959209 · Cited by 56
Ezzat, M. A., Abd El Ghany, M. A., Almotairi, S., & Salem, M. A.-M. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093222 · Cited by 39
Qiu, L., Zhao, L., Hou, R., Zhao, W., Zhang, S., Lin, Z., Teng, H., & Zhao, J. (2023) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102176 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, B.-B., Xing, C., Xie, C.-W., Wu, J., & Geng, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2825-2838
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2553156677
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Label Distribution Learning With Label Ambiguity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2017.2689998
- The paper
- Gao, B.-B., Xing, C., Xie, C.-W., Wu, J., & Geng, X. (2017). Deep Label Distribution Learning With Label Ambiguity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2017.2689998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.