The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Video Segmentation via Object Flow
Abstract
Video object segmentation is challenging due to fast moving objects, deforming shapes, and cluttered backgrounds. Optical flow can be used to propagate an object segmentation over time but, unfortunately, flow is often inaccurate, particularly around object boundaries. Such boundaries are precisely where we want our segmentation to be accurate. To obtain accurate segmentation across time, we propose an efficient algorithm that considers video segmentation and optical flow estimation simultaneously. For video segmentation, we formulate a principled, multiscale, spatio-temporal objective function that uses optical flow to propagate information between frames. For optical flow estimation, particularly at object boundaries, we compute the flow independently in the segmented regions and recompose the results. We call the process object flow and demonstrate the effectiveness of jointly optimizing optical flow and video segmentation using an iterative scheme. Experiments on the SegTrack v2 and Youtube-Objects datasets show that the proposed algorithm performs favorably against the other state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow
Baker, S., Scharstein, D., Lewis, J. P., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Szeliski, R. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0390-2 · Cited by 2,205 · cited 2×
“Optical flow estimation has been extensively studied [2, 6, 30] and it is widely used for video segmentation and (a) frame t− 1 (b) frame t”
MethodSelf-citation
Cited by
Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approach
Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Bertinetto, L., Hu, W., & Torr, P. H. S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00142 · Cited by 1,554
One-Shot Video Object Segmentation
Caelles, S., Maninis, K.-K., Pont-Tuset, J., Leal-Taixe, L., Cremers, D., & Van Gool, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.565 · Cited by 927
Fast Video Object Segmentation by Reference-Guided Mask Propagation
Oh, S. W., Lee, J.-Y., Sunkavalli, K., & Kim, S. J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00770 · Cited by 420
Efficient Video Object Segmentation via Network Modulation
Yang, L., Wang, Y., Xiong, X., Yang, J., & Katsaggelos, A. K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00680 · Cited by 386
Jain, S. D., Xiong, B., & Grauman, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.228 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, Y.-H., Yang, M.-H., & Black, M. J.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 3899-3908
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2460260369
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.