The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Contrast Learning for Salient Object Detection
Abstract
Salient object detection has recently witnessed substantial progress due to powerful features extracted using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, existing CNN-based methods operate at the patch level instead of the pixel level. Resulting saliency maps are typically blurry, especially near the boundary of salient objects. Furthermore, image patches are treated as independent samples even when they are overlapping, giving rise to significant redundancy in computation and storage. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end deep contrast network to overcome the aforementioned limitations. Our deep network consists of two complementary components, a pixel-level fully convolutional stream and a segment-wise spatial pooling stream. The first stream directly produces a saliency map with pixel-level accuracy from an input image. The second stream extracts segment-wise features very efficiently, and better models saliency discontinuities along object boundaries. Finally, a fully connected CRF model can be optionally incorporated to improve spatial coherence and contour localization in the fused result from these two streams. Experimental results demonstrate that our deep model significantly improves the state of the art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105
Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs
Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Kokkinos, I., Murphy, K., & Yuille, A. L. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.7062 · Cited by 4,213
Learning Hierarchical Features for Scene Labeling
Farabet, C., Couprie, C., Najman, L., & LeCun, Y. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.231 · Cited by 2,620
HD-CNN: Hierarchical Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Large Scale Visual Recognition
Yan, Z., Zhang, H., Piramuthu, R., Jagadeesh, V., DeCoste, D., Di, W., & Yu, Y. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.314 · Cited by 936 · cited 1×
“Recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence have been revolutionized by deep convolutional neural networks, which have set new state of the art on a number of visual recognition tasks, including image classification [25], object detection [16], scene classification [48] and scene parsing [13], closing the g…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Object Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545
Structure-Measure: A New Way to Evaluate Foreground Maps
Fan, D.-P., Cheng, M.-M., Liu, Y., Li, T., & Borji, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.487 · Cited by 2,092
Enhanced-alignment Measure for Binary Foreground Map Evaluation
Fan, D.-P., Gong, C., Cao, Y., Ren, B., Cheng, M.-M., & Borji, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/97 · Cited by 1,607
EGNet: Edge Guidance Network for Salient Object Detection
Zhao, J., Liu, J.-J., Fan, D.-P., Cao, Y., Yang, J., & Cheng, M.-M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00887 · Cited by 1,202
Pyramid Feature Attention Network for Saliency Detection
Zhao, T., & Wu, X. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00320 · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, G., & Yu, Y.
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 478-487
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2293332611
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 39.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.