Cited by 307Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes

Open access
Braun, Markus, Krebs, Sebastian, Flohr, Fabian, Gavrila, Dariu M.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Big data has had a great share in the success of deep learning in computer vision. Recent works suggest that there is significant further potential to increase object detection performance by utilizing even bigger datasets. In this paper, we introduce the EuroCity Persons dataset, which provides a large number of highly diverse, accurate and detailed annotations of pedestrians, cyclists and other riders in urban traffic scenes. The images for this dataset were collected on-board a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries. With over 238200 person instances manually labeled in over 47300 images, EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than datasets used previously for person detection in traffic scenes. The dataset furthermore contains a large number of person orientation annotations (over 211200). We optimize four state-of-the-art deep learning approaches (Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD and YOLOv3) to serve as baselines for the new object detection benchmark. We analyze the generalization capabilities of these detectors when trained with the new dataset. We furthermore study the effect of the training set size, the dataset diversity (day- vs. night-time, geographical region), the dataset detail (i.e. availability of object orientation information) and the annotation quality on the detector performance. Finally, we analyze error sources and discuss the road ahead.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper introduces EuroCity Persons, a large, diverse benchmark of over 238,200 manually labeled person instances in over 47,300 images from 31 European cities, with orientation and occlusion/truncation annotations. It benchmarks Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD, and YOLOv3, showing that data scale and diversity still improve detection and that ECP pre-training transfers well to KITTI and CityPersons.

Key findings

  • EuroCity Persons contains over 238,200 person instances manually labeled in over 47,300 images, collected in 31 cities of 12 European countries; it includes over 211,200 orientation annotations and day/night data (Table 1: 40,219 day and 7,118 night images; 183,182 day pedestrians, 35,323 night pedestrians, 18,216 day riders, 1,564 night riders).
  • The best baseline variant, Faster R-CNN all, achieved log average miss-rate (LAMR) of 8.1 on the reasonable, 17.1 on the small, and 33.9 on the occluded test scenarios; two-stage Faster R-CNN variants performed overall best, while YOLOv3 and SSD performed better than R-FCN on the reasonable and occluded scenarios.
  • Pre-training on ECP and fine-tuning improved KITTI average precision by 5, 8, and 11 percentage points for easy, moderate, and hard validation sets, respectively; on CityPersons, ECP→CP achieved LAMR 14.9 versus 17.2 for CP-only training, and on the official KITTI test set ECP pre-training reached 72.6 AP versus 65.9 AP.
  • Dataset aspects mattered: regional bias was statistically significant (p = 0.0098 and 0.0020, 99% confidence); night-time performance was worse; ignore-region handling improved LAMR by about 1.5 points; orientation Biternion loss lowered detection by about one point; annotation quality checks estimated 0.7% missed annotations, bounding-box inter-annotator deviation below 1.4 px up to 200 px, and orientation deviation from 20° at 40 px to about 10° above 100 px.

Methods

  • Images were collected from a moving vehicle with a 1920×1024 automotive-grade camera at 20 Hz in 31 cities of 12 European countries; every 80th frame was sampled, and pedestrians/riders were manually annotated with tight bounding boxes, occlusion/truncation levels, orientation for persons larger than 40 px, and additional tags.
  • Four deep learning detectors were optimized as baselines: Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD, and YOLOv3, using VGG-16 or Darknet-53 backbones pre-trained on ImageNet, with anchor/default box recall optimization, ignore-region handling, and training-sample filtering; evaluation used LAMR, AP, and average orientation similarity (AOS) on reasonable, small, and occluded test scenarios.
  • Experiments analyzed generalization via pre-training/fine-tuning on KITTI and CityPersons, and dataset aspects: quantity (training set size), diversity (geographical West vs. East Europe, day vs. night), detail (ignore regions, riders, orientation), and accuracy (annotation perturbation and inter-annotator agreement).

Limitations

  • The paper states that available GPU memory of 12 GB limited the maximal upscaling factor, so SSD and YOLOv3 could not be trained with upscaled images; runtime optimization was outside the scope of the study; test set annotations are withheld; and the dataset is made available for non-commercial, scientific use.
  • The paper states that baseline and generalization experiments mainly involved the day-time EuroCity Persons dataset and the pedestrian class, unless stated otherwise; for day/night comparisons, the night-time dataset is only 20% of the day data, so training samples were reduced accordingly.
  • Evident from the text (not framed as author limitations): dataset biases remain strong enough that fine-tuning on the target dataset is still needed even with ECP pre-training; annotation perturbation experiments are artificial; and evaluation is limited to selected monocular detectors and person detection, not all possible methods or application contexts.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2019.2897684

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 7

    The recall for pedestrian boxes of the reasonable scenario larger than 40 px is about 100% for all methods for an IoU of 0.5.

    “The recall for pedestrian boxes of the reasonable scenario larger than 40 px is about 100% for all methods for an IoU of 0.5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    Faster R-CNN all performs best overall.

    “Faster R-CNN all , that is trained with pedestrians of all sizes and of occlusions up to 80%, performs best overall.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    Both one stage detectors YOLOv3 and SSD perform better than R-FCN at least on the reasonable and occluded test scenarios.

    “Interestingly, both one stage detectors YOLOv3 and SSD perform better than R-FCN at least on the reasonable and occluded test scenarios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    EuroCity Persons provides orientation information for all persons larger than 40 px, including those riding.

    “We provide this information for all persons larger than 40 px (including those riding).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Overall object orientation is an important cue for predicting future motion of persons in traffic scenes.
  • Findingown data
    § The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1

    EuroCity Persons contains over 211200 person orientation annotations.

    “The dataset furthermore contains a large number of person orientation annotations (over 211200).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
  • May combine two claims. 41
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    The original resolution Faster R-CNN variants run 66% faster during training and testing.

    “Still, they run 66% faster during training and testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    Faster R-CNN small performs best on the corresponding small test scenario, and also slightly better on the reasonable setup.

    “Faster R-CNN small performs best on the corresponding small test scenario, and interestingly also slightly better on the reasonable setup.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6

    The lowest average number of pedestrians per city in EuroCity Persons (1.8) occurred in Leipzig, likely due to rainy weather during recording.

    “For example, the lowest average number of pedestrians per city (1.8) occurred in Leipzig likely due to the rainy weather during recording.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    OHEM proves useful when comparing results for the two R-FCN variants with enabled and disabled OHEM for the occluded scenario.

    “OHEM proves useful when comparing results for the two R-FCN variants with enabled and disabled OHEM for the occluded scenario.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    EuroCity Persons annotations extend beyond bounding boxes and include tags for occlusion/truncation, overall body orientations, and a variety of object- and image-related tags.

    “EuroCity Persons furthermore offers detailed annotations; besides bounding box information, it includes tags for occlusion/truncation and annotates body orientation (the latter has relevance for object tracking and path prediction).”
    • Also stated in: § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4 · plain
      “Annotations extend beyond bounding boxes and include overall body orientations and a variety of object- and image-related tags.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 3.1 Dataset Collection · p. 4

    Each city recording in EuroCity Persons lasted on average 1.7 hours.

    “We collected 53 hours of image data in total, for an average of 1.7 hours per city.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.3 Data Subsets · p. 5 · plain
      “Each city recording lasted on average 1.7 hours.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6

    Recordings at night-time in EuroCity Persons suffer from low contrast, color loss and motion blur.

    “Recordings at night-time suffer from low contrast, color loss and motion blur.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    EuroCity Persons provides a new level of data diversity due to its comparatively large geographic coverage, recordings during both day and night-time, and recordings during all four seasons.

    “Due to its comparatively large geographic coverage, its recordings during both day and night-time, and during all four seasons (light/short summer to thick/long winter clothing) it provides a new level of data diversity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Datasets captured in few countries and only in daylight and dry weather conditions hamper generalization to real-world applications.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6

    EuroCity Persons contains challenging occlusions and overlapping objects that complicate non-maximum suppression, which are missing in KITTI and Caltech where on average there is about one pedestrian per frame.

    “These imply challenging occlusions and overlapping objects that complicate non-maximum suppression (these difficult scenarios are missing in KITTI and Caltech, where on average there is about one pedestrian per frame).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    In terms of orientation angle, the average deviation starts at 20 degrees for object sizes of 40 px and reduces to about 10 degrees for object sizes larger than 100 px.

    “Figure 9 shows that in terms of orientation angle, the average deviation starts at 20 degrees for object sizes of 40 px and reduces to about 10 degrees for object sizes larger than 100 px .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    Rare poses or pedestrians leaning on bicycles are further challenges.

    “Further challenges are rare poses or pedestrians leaning on bicycles as shown in the Others group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11

    Using the exact same settings as in [4], we arrive at a LAMR of 12.2, which is improved by ECP pre-training to 10.9.

    “If we use the exact same settings as in [4], we arrive at an even better LAMR of 12.2, which is improved by ECP pre-training to 10.9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14

    The ECP dataset covers a large geographical region, day and night, and different weather conditions.

    “The ECP dataset covers a large geographical region, day and night, and different weather conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    The absolute detection performance for pedestrians and riders is quite similar although there are 10 times more pedestrians than riders in the training dataset.

    “The absolute detection performance for pedestrians and riders is quite similar although there are 10 times more pedestrians than riders in our training dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    Using the aggregated AOS metric for the reasonable test scenario, the score is 86.0 for the L1 loss and 86.7 for the Biternion loss.

    “Using the aggregated AOS metric from Section 3.5 for the reasonable test scenario we get a score of 86.0 for the L1 loss and 86.7 for the Biternion loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    The Biternion loss is superior to the L1 loss as it does not suffer from the periodicity of an orientation angle.

    “The Biternion loss is superior to the L1 loss as it does not suffer from the periodicity of an orientation angle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11

    Pre-training on KITTI data has no influence on detection performance on the CP benchmark, which remains at a LAMR of 17.2.

    “The same findings hold for the CP benchmark, on which pre-training on KITTI data has no influence on the detection performance that remains at a LAMR of 17 . 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 9

    The share of false positives touching ground-truth samples remains approximately the same for the entire fppi range.

    “The share of false positives touching ground-truth samples remains approximately the same for the entire fppi range.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    If neighboring classes are counted as false positives, detection performance decreases: the LAMR for the baseline method increases from 9.4 to 11.0.

    “If these neighboring classes are instead counted as false positives, detection performance decreases as expected: the LAMR for our baseline method increases from 9.4 to 11.0, as shown in Table 12.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 9

    The share of larger other-background objects increases with decreasing fppi.

    “Also the share of larger other-background objects increases with decreasing fppi .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    The miss-rate for Faster R-CNN all at this fppi is about 10% for the small test scenario and about 30% for the occluded test scenario.

    “However, the miss-rate for Faster R-CNN all at this fppi is about 10% for the small test scenario and about 30% for the occluded test scenario.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 9

    Localization errors account for about 60% of all errors at a high fppi of 6, decreasing to about 40% for a low fppi rate of 4×10^-3.

    “Figure 6 shows that localization errors account for about 60% of all errors at a high fppi of 6, decreasing to about 40% for a low fppi rate of 4 × 10 -3 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13

    As there are about 48000 pedestrians in the test dataset, this corresponds to 0.7% missed annotations, which lies within the 1% quality requirement of Section 3.2.

    “As there are about 48000 pedestrians in the test dataset, this corresponds to 0.7% missed annotations, which lies within the 1% quality requirement of Section 3.2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12

    For the WE and EE test sets, the p-values are 0.0098 and 0.0020, respectively.

    “For the WE and EE test sets, these values are 0 . 0098 and 0 . 0020 , respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 9

    The share of false positives touching ignore regions is similar for a large fppi range but decreases somewhat for fppi below 10^-2.

    “The share of false positives touching ignore regions is similar for a large fppi range but decreases somewhat for fppi below 10 -2 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    When selecting IoU threshold there is a tradeoff between recall and precision as shown in Table 6.

    “When selecting the IoU threshold there is a tradeoff between recall and precision as shown in Table 6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16

    We found a variant of Faster R-CNN to perform overall best, with a log-average-miss-rate of 8.1, 17.1 and 33.9 on the reasonable, small and occluded test scenario, respectively.

    “we found a variant of Faster R-CNN to perform overall best, with a log-averagemiss-rate of 8.1, 17.1 and 33.9 on the reasonable, small and occluded test scenario, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Many false positives arise by accidental overlaying of structures at different depths, and are not consistent over time when observed from a moving camera.

    “Third, many false positives arise by an accidental overlaying of structures at different depths, and are not consistent over time when observed from a moving camera.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16

    A statistically significant bias exists on detection performance across large-scale regions in Europe, resulting in performance variations of the same order.

    “Experimental results furthermore indicate that a statistically significant bias exists on detection performance across largescale regions in Europe, resulting in performance variations of the same order.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    The amount of missed and hallucinated objects in EuroCity Persons annotations were each to lie within 1% of the annotated number.

    “The amount of missed and hallucinated objects were each to lie within 1% of the annotated number.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1 Datasets · p. 2

    Caltech lists a large number of pedestrian annotations, but only an unspecified subset were done manually; the number of manual annotations is estimated to be an order of magnitude smaller, with about 2300 unique persons.

    “Although Caltech [2] lists a large number of pedestrian annotations, only an unspecified subset of these annotations were done manually, the remainder was obtained by interpolation (we estimate the number of manual annotations to be an order of magnitude smaller). In total there are about 2300 unique persons in this dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    The comparatively small size of the training data in Caltech and KITTI makes these benchmarks prone to dataset bias and over-fitting.

    “The comparatively small size of the training data (i.e. several thousands samples) furthermore makes these benchmarks prone to dataset bias and to over-fitting [15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] [15] A. Torralba and A. A. Efros, 'Unbiased look at dataset bias,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , June 2011, pp. 1521-1528. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    EuroCity Persons annotations were double checked by a quality validation team that was disjoint from the annotation team.

    “Annotations were double checked by a quality validation team that was disjoint from the annotation team.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 7

    Many recent pedestrian detection methods are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.

    “Many recent pedestrian detection methods [62], [63], [71], [55], [70], [57], [56] are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [62] [62] J. Li, X. Liang, Y. Wei, T. Xu, J. Feng, and S. Yan, 'Perceptual generative adversarial networks for small object detection,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 1951-1959. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [63] [63] S. Huang and D. Ramanan, 'Expecting the unexpected: Training detectors for unusual pedestrians with adversarial imposters,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 4664-4673. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [71] [71] J. Mao, T. Xiao, Y. Jiang, and Z. Cao, 'What can help pedestrian detection?' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 6034-6043. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2

    CityPersons concluded that more training data is necessary for recent high-capacity deep learning architectures.

    “Although these data additions are helpful, [4] conclude that more training data is necessary for the recent high-capacity deep learning architectures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    All EuroCity Persons annotations were manually performed without automated support to avoid undesirable bias towards certain algorithms during benchmarking.

    “All annotations were manually performed; no automated support was used, as it might introduce an undesirable bias towards certain algorithms during benchmarking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 7

    YOLOv3's design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects compared to its predecessors.

    “We evaluate its latest extension YOLOv3 [34], as in comparison with its predecessors, its design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, 'Yolov3: An incremental improvement,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 , 2018. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    Annotators were asked to be accurate within two pixels for bounding box sides (apart from ignore regions) and within 20 degrees for orientation.

    “Annotators were asked to be accurate within two pixels for bounding box sides (apart from ignore regions) and within 20 degrees for orientation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 2.1 Datasets · p. 2

    Cyclist and other riders annotations are missing in Caltech, and orientation annotations are missing in both Caltech and CityPersons.

    “Cyclist and other riders annotations are missing in the Caltech dataset, and orientation annotations are missing in both Caltech and CityPersons datasets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data
    § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4

    Detectors trained with EuroCity Persons generalize to previous datasets, proving the dataset's usefulness.

    “We prove the generalization capabilities of detectors trained with the new dataset and thereby its usefulness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5

    All visible persons were annotated in every sampled frame to avoid flawed generation of background samples during training and bootstrapping.

    “For every sampled frame, all visible persons were annotated; otherwise, missed annotations could lead to the flawed generation of background samples during training and bootstrapping.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Current pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.

    “A recent paper [1] argues that current pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] [1] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, M. Omran, J. Hosang, and B. Schiele, 'Towards reaching human performance in pedestrian detection,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 973-985, 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    At the end of training only the best snapshot on the validation dataset is selected and evaluated on the test dataset, to avoid optimizing on the latter.

    “At the end of training only the best snapshot on the validation dataset is selected and evaluated on the test dataset, to avoid optimizing on the latter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1 Datasets · p. 2

    KITTI, Caltech and TDC datasets have been collected in one city only; CityPersons was recorded in 27 different cities but, apart from Strasbourg and Zurich, covers only Germany and recordings were not made throughout all seasons.

    “KITTI, Caltech and TDC datasets have been collected in one city only. CityPersons was recorded in 27 different cities but, apart of Strasbourg and Zurich, it covers only Germany and recordings were not made throughout all seasons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] [3] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, 'Are We Ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2012, pp. 3354-3361. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [5] [5] X. Li, F. Flohr, Y. Yang, H. Xiong, M. Braun, S. Pan, K. Li, and D. M. Gavrila, 'A New Benchmark for Vison-Based Cyclist Detection,' in IEEE Intell. Veh , 2016. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11

    Using transfer learning to pretrain a network on generic data and fine-tune on the target domain is widely applied and used to increase overall performance.

    “Using transfer learning to pretrain a network on generic data and fine-tune on the target domain is widely applied and used to increase overall performance [74], [75].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [74] [74] J. Yosinski, J. Clune, Y. Bengio, and H. Lipson, 'How transferable are features in deep neural networks?' in Adv. in NIPS , 2014, pp. 3320-3328. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [75] [75] A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson, 'CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2014, pp. 512-519. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14

    Pedestrians without bounding box labels may be used as background samples during training, which results in confusion of pedestrians and background during testing.

    “Pedestrians without bounding box labels may be used as background samples during training which results in the confusion of pedestrians and background during testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12

    They propose to focus on the datasets instead of applying more and more bells and whistles to recent methods resulting in the danger to overfit on existing datasets.

    “Thus, they propose to focus on the datasets instead of applying more and more bells and whistles to recent methods resulting in the danger to overfit on existing datasets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] [7] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    A higher IoU threshold would result in more false negatives.

    “On the other hand, a higher IoU threshold would result in more false negatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 9

    Possible objects inside ignore regions seem to lead to erroneous detections in their surroundings.

    “Possible objects inside these ignore regions seem to lead to erroneous detections in their surroundings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    Head-occluded cases are particularly challenging for pedestrian detection methods, as these cases are quite rare in the training dataset.

    “These are particularly challenging for pedestrian detection methods, as these cases are quite rare in the training dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11

    The superior performance on both KITTI and CP datasets when using ECP for pre-training indicates a high dataset diversity; models trained on this dataset will have increased generalization capabilities.

    “The superior performance on both KITTI and CP datasets, when using ECP for pre-training indicates a high dataset diversity; models trained on this dataset will have increased generalization capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11

    The LAMR listed in [4] for training and testing on CP was 12.8 rather than 17.2 listed here; the difference arises from a difference in reasonable settings used.

    “Note that the LAMR listed in [4] for training and testing on CP was 12.8 rather than 17.2 listed here. The difference arises from a difference in reasonable settings used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12

    Pushing performance boundaries by using better datasets is not yet at its end.

    “As stated in [7] pushing performance boundaries by using better datasets is not yet at its end.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] [7] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1 Baselines · p. 8

    NMS is an important part of many deep learning methods that is usually not trained but has a great influence on detection performance.

    “Thus, NMS is an important part of many deep learning methods that is usually not trained but has a great influence on detection performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    The three steps proposal generation, classification/bounding box regression, and NMS would finally be combined in a true end-to-end approach.

    “Thus, the three steps proposal generation, classification/bounding box regression, and NMS would finally be combined in a true end-to-end approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    The drop in recall for pedestrians closer than 8 m could be due to the headlights of the recording vehicle.

    “The drop in recall for pedestrians closer than 8 m could be due to the headlights of the recording vehicle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Such an approach could even switch on a per frame basis between sub-models, e.g. when sudden change in lighting.

    “Such an approach could even switch on a per frame basis between sub-models, e.g. when there is a sudden change in lighting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    More training data is especially helpful for persons in nonstandard poses, in rainy or night-time conditions, or under partial occlusions.

    “More training data is especially helpful for persons in nonstandard poses, in rainy or night-time conditions, or under partial occlusions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    That necessitates design of appropriate multi-task deep nets that more effectively incorporate global scene context.

    “That necessitates the design of appropriate multi-task deep nets that more effectively incorporate global scene context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16

    We provided some insights regarding effect of annotation accuracy on performance that could be useful for future annotation efforts.

    “We provided some insights regarding the effect of annotation accuracy on performance that could be useful for future annotation efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14

    This is in accordance with earlier experiments on transfer learning on a smaller scale by [4].

    “This is in accordance with earlier experiments on transfer learning on a smaller scale by [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    In [78] a neural network is trained to rescore detections, which renders a further NMS stage unnecessary.

    “In [78] a neural network is trained to rescore detections, which renders a further NMS stage unnecessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Proposal boxes are classified independently of each other resulting in multiple detections for same object, particularly if proposals share similar image locations.

    “Still, the proposal boxes are classified independently of each other resulting in multiple detections for the same object in particular if the proposals share similar image locations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    The neural network solely relies on bounding box locations and confidence scores as input.

    “Still, the neural network solely relies on bounding box locations and confidence scores as input.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Performance has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade, in terms of reduction of number of false positives at given correct detection rate, comparing best-performer in this paper (R-CNN) with early benchmark [11], albeit different datasets.

    “When comparing its performance with that of the best-performer in this paper, the R-CNN, one observes that performance has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade, in terms of the reduction of the number of false positives at given correct detection rate, albeit dealing with two different datasets of urban traffic (Figure 8 in [11] vs. Figure 5 here).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] [11] M. Enzweiler and D. M. Gavrila, 'Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 21792195, 2009. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16

    Development of appropriate multi-task deep networks, which combine a holistic approach to scene understanding with specialized person detection, taking advantage of known bias (geolocation, time of day, weather condition), seems promising.

    “The development of appropriate multi-task deep networks, which combine a holistic approach to scene understanding with specialized person detection, taking advantage of known bias (geolocation, time of day, weather condition) seem promising.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Lenseflares might occur from one frame to another when vehicle turns into direction of sun.

    “For example lenseflares might occur from one frame to another when the vehicle turns into the direction of the sun.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Systems like [79] take into account additional pose information.

    “Systems like [79] come into play which take into account additional pose information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [79] [79] J. F. P. Kooij, N. Schneider, F. Flohr, and D. M. Gavrila, 'Contextbased pedestrian path prediction,' in Proc. of the ECCV , 2014, pp. 618-633. <!-- image --> 品 <!-- image --> <!-- image --> <!-- image --> Markus Braun Markus Braun received the M.Sc. degree in computer science from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, in 2015. Since then he is working toward the Ph.D. degree at TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands. He is also currently with Daimler Research and Development in the Environment Perception department, Ulm, Germany. His research interests include machine learning and video

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16

    Future improvement will in part still come from additional data.

    “Future improvement will in part still come from additional data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    An ensemble of specialized deep learning models could take advantage of known bias (particular location and digital maps, weather, time of day).

    “An ensemble of specialized deep learning models could take advantage of known bias (particular location and digital maps, weather, time of day).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Headlights could result in very bright spots for the lower body of pedestrians and complicate detection.

    “These could result in very bright spots for the lower body of pedestrians and complicate detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    As it is already a neural network architecture it can easily be integrated into existing detection networks.

    “As it is already a neural network architecture it can easily be integrated into existing detection networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Better solutions are needed to provide accurate localization in presence of multiple persons and significant occlusion.

    “In terms of vision methods, better solutions are needed to provide accurate localization in the presence of multiple persons and significant occlusion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    The best performer on an early benchmark [11] was a method based on HOG features and SVM classifier.

    “When viewed in historic context, the bestperformer on an early benchmark [11] was a method based on HOG features and SVM classifier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] [11] M. Enzweiler and D. M. Gavrila, 'Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 21792195, 2009. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Vehicle actuation (braking, steering) does not solely rely on monocular object detection.

    “Thus vehicle actuation (braking, steering) does not solely rely on monocular object detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Doing so the network could be informed about how many objects are present.

    “Doing so the network could be informed about how many objects are present.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    Utilizing already annotated reflections and depictions as additional classes during training could improve discrimination performance.

    “Utilizing the already annotated reflections and depictions as additional classes during training could improve the discrimination performance as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    Not all errors are equal in vehicle application; errors increasingly matter when they involve objects close to the vehicle.

    “First, other than we assume in this study, not all errors are equal in the vehicle application. Errors increasingly matter when they involve objects close to the vehicle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15

    The found relations between annotation quality and quantity and detection performance, together with a price tag for annotations at various quality levels, can help optimizing requirement specification for dataset annotation.

    “The found relations between annotation quality and quantity on one hand and detection performance on the other (i.e. Table 13), together with a price tag for annotations at various quality levels can help optimizing the requirement specification for dataset annotation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16

    [78] proposes to incorporate image features in future works.

    “To further improve the performance [78] proposes to incorporate image features in future works.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

80 of 80
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Overall object orientation is an important cue for predicting future motion of persons in traffic scenes.

    “The overall object orientation is an important cue for the prediction of future motion of persons in traffic scenes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Datasets captured in few countries and only in daylight and dry weather conditions hamper generalization to real-world applications.

    “The before-mentioned datasets were captured in few countries ( 1 -3 ), and in daylight and dry weather conditions only; this hampers generalization to real world applications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Top ranking methods on KITTI and Caltech use deep convolutional neural networks.

    “As the top ranking methods on KITTI and Caltech use deep convolutional neural networks, we select our baselines among these methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One stage methods often trade faster inference against a lower detection accuracy.

    “The one stage methods often trade faster inference against a lower detection accuracy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An object without any matching anchor box or default box can neither be used for training nor detected during testing in the evaluated methods.

    “All four methods evaluated have in common that an object without any matching anchor box or default box can neither be used for training nor detected during testing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Training with very small or strongly occluded samples could lead to models detecting a lot more false positives.

    “Training with very small or strongly occluded samples could lead to models detecting a lot more false positives.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.

    “One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.

    “Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In street scenarios usually only the lower part of a pedestrian is occluded due to parked cars or other obstacles.

    “In street scenarios usually only the lower part of a pedestrian is occluded due to parked cars or other obstacles.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A dataset with a reduced bias should better capture the true world, and result in superior generalization capabilities of the detectors which are trained on this dataset.

    “Adataset with a reduced bias should better capture the true world, and result in superior generalization capabilities of the detectors which are trained on this dataset.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    KITTI and EuroCity Persons differ in camera types used for recording.

    “KITTI and EuroCity Persons for example differ in camera types used for recording.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CityPersons (CP) and EuroCity Persons (ECP) datasets have been recorded with similar cameras.

    “The CityPersons (CP) and EuroCity Persons (ECP) datasets have been recorded with similar cameras.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Body orientation correlates with the aspect ratio.

    “As body orientation correlates with the aspect ratio we assume that the bounding box regression task and hereby the detection performance could also benefit from learning all three tasks jointly in one network.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.

    “there are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.

    “active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current commercial systems are in the context of driver assistance, meaning that a correct detection performance of about 90% is acceptable, as long as the false alarm rate is essentially zero.

    “It should be finally noted that current commercial systems are in the context of driver assistance, meaning that a correct detection performance of about 90% is acceptable, as long as the false alarm rate is essentially zero.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.

    “Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.

    “In general, there is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The task of suppressing multiple detections for the same object is usually solved by the decoupled non-maximum suppression.

    “The task of suppressing multiple detections for the same object is usually solved by the decoupled non-maximum suppression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Motion prediction based on point kinematics is often not accurate because of abrupt changes in person motion.

    “Motion prediction based on point kinematics is often not accurate because of abrupt changes in person motion.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In this study, all errors are equal in the vehicle application.

    “other than we assume in this study, not all errors are equal in the vehicle application.”
21 of 21

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semantic segmentation networks for autonomous driving have been successfully trained directly on fisheye images, but due to absence of fisheye datasets, they use artificially warped images of Cityscapes for training and test on fisheye images; artificial images cannot increase the originally captured FOV.

    “Semantic segmentation networks for autonomous driving [47] have been successfully trained directly on fisheye images in [12,45].Due to absence of fisheye datasets, they make use of artificially warped images of Cityscapes for training and testing was performed on fisheye images.However, the artificial images cannot increase the originally captured FOV.”

    From WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most reviewed datasets provide ground-truth labels for 2D object detection and semantic segmentation tasks.

    “Most of the reviewed datasets provide ground-truth labels for 2D object detection and semantic segmentation tasks [60], [75], [88], [90]-[93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ignoring regions raises LAMR rather than lowering it

    Minor

    The text says LAMR drops without ignore-region handling, but Table 11 shows it rising from 9.4 to 10.9 for the reasonable scenario and from 22.8 to 24.5 for the small scenario.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. li, 2016, A new benchmark for vison-based cyclist detection, Proc IEEE Intell Veh Symp, 1028

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Daimler (Germany) (DE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
1844-1861
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2803740064
Cited by
307
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 1
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
human detection, traffic scenes, pedestrian detection, cyclist detection, object detection benchmark, data diversity, annotation quality, training data size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review