EuroCity Persons: A Novel Benchmark for Person Detection in Traffic Scenes
Open accessAbstract
Big data has had a great share in the success of deep learning in computer vision. Recent works suggest that there is significant further potential to increase object detection performance by utilizing even bigger datasets. In this paper, we introduce the EuroCity Persons dataset, which provides a large number of highly diverse, accurate and detailed annotations of pedestrians, cyclists and other riders in urban traffic scenes. The images for this dataset were collected on-board a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries. With over 238200 person instances manually labeled in over 47300 images, EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than datasets used previously for person detection in traffic scenes. The dataset furthermore contains a large number of person orientation annotations (over 211200). We optimize four state-of-the-art deep learning approaches (Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD and YOLOv3) to serve as baselines for the new object detection benchmark. We analyze the generalization capabilities of these detectors when trained with the new dataset. We furthermore study the effect of the training set size, the dataset diversity (day- vs. night-time, geographical region), the dataset detail (i.e. availability of object orientation information) and the annotation quality on the detector performance. Finally, we analyze error sources and discuss the road ahead.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper introduces EuroCity Persons, a large, diverse benchmark of over 238,200 manually labeled person instances in over 47,300 images from 31 European cities, with orientation and occlusion/truncation annotations. It benchmarks Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD, and YOLOv3, showing that data scale and diversity still improve detection and that ECP pre-training transfers well to KITTI and CityPersons.
Key findings
- EuroCity Persons contains over 238,200 person instances manually labeled in over 47,300 images, collected in 31 cities of 12 European countries; it includes over 211,200 orientation annotations and day/night data (Table 1: 40,219 day and 7,118 night images; 183,182 day pedestrians, 35,323 night pedestrians, 18,216 day riders, 1,564 night riders).
- The best baseline variant, Faster R-CNN all, achieved log average miss-rate (LAMR) of 8.1 on the reasonable, 17.1 on the small, and 33.9 on the occluded test scenarios; two-stage Faster R-CNN variants performed overall best, while YOLOv3 and SSD performed better than R-FCN on the reasonable and occluded scenarios.
- Pre-training on ECP and fine-tuning improved KITTI average precision by 5, 8, and 11 percentage points for easy, moderate, and hard validation sets, respectively; on CityPersons, ECP→CP achieved LAMR 14.9 versus 17.2 for CP-only training, and on the official KITTI test set ECP pre-training reached 72.6 AP versus 65.9 AP.
- Dataset aspects mattered: regional bias was statistically significant (p = 0.0098 and 0.0020, 99% confidence); night-time performance was worse; ignore-region handling improved LAMR by about 1.5 points; orientation Biternion loss lowered detection by about one point; annotation quality checks estimated 0.7% missed annotations, bounding-box inter-annotator deviation below 1.4 px up to 200 px, and orientation deviation from 20° at 40 px to about 10° above 100 px.
Methods
- Images were collected from a moving vehicle with a 1920×1024 automotive-grade camera at 20 Hz in 31 cities of 12 European countries; every 80th frame was sampled, and pedestrians/riders were manually annotated with tight bounding boxes, occlusion/truncation levels, orientation for persons larger than 40 px, and additional tags.
- Four deep learning detectors were optimized as baselines: Faster R-CNN, R-FCN, SSD, and YOLOv3, using VGG-16 or Darknet-53 backbones pre-trained on ImageNet, with anchor/default box recall optimization, ignore-region handling, and training-sample filtering; evaluation used LAMR, AP, and average orientation similarity (AOS) on reasonable, small, and occluded test scenarios.
- Experiments analyzed generalization via pre-training/fine-tuning on KITTI and CityPersons, and dataset aspects: quantity (training set size), diversity (geographical West vs. East Europe, day vs. night), detail (ignore regions, riders, orientation), and accuracy (annotation perturbation and inter-annotator agreement).
Limitations
- The paper states that available GPU memory of 12 GB limited the maximal upscaling factor, so SSD and YOLOv3 could not be trained with upscaled images; runtime optimization was outside the scope of the study; test set annotations are withheld; and the dataset is made available for non-commercial, scientific use.
- The paper states that baseline and generalization experiments mainly involved the day-time EuroCity Persons dataset and the pedestrian class, unless stated otherwise; for day/night comparisons, the night-time dataset is only 20% of the day data, so training samples were reduced accordingly.
- Evident from the text (not framed as author limitations): dataset biases remain strong enough that fine-tuning on the target dataset is still needed even with ECP pre-training; annotation perturbation experiments are artificial; and evaluation is limited to selected monocular detectors and person detection, not all possible methods or application contexts.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 40 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 7
The recall for pedestrian boxes of the reasonable scenario larger than 40 px is about 100% for all methods for an IoU of 0.5.
“The recall for pedestrian boxes of the reasonable scenario larger than 40 px is about 100% for all methods for an IoU of 0.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Faster R-CNN all performs best overall.
“Faster R-CNN all , that is trained with pedestrians of all sizes and of occlusions up to 80%, performs best overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Both one stage detectors YOLOv3 and SSD perform better than R-FCN at least on the reasonable and occluded test scenarios.
“Interestingly, both one stage detectors YOLOv3 and SSD perform better than R-FCN at least on the reasonable and occluded test scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5
EuroCity Persons provides orientation information for all persons larger than 40 px, including those riding.
“We provide this information for all persons larger than 40 px (including those riding).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Overall object orientation is an important cue for predicting future motion of persons in traffic scenes.
- Findingown data§ The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1
EuroCity Persons contains over 211200 person orientation annotations.
“The dataset furthermore contains a large number of person orientation annotations (over 211200).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning§ 3.1 Dataset Collection · p. 4
A substantial fraction of the person annotations in EuroCity Persons are unique.
“This means that a substantial fraction of the person annotations in the dataset are unique, although especially at traffic lights and in slow moving traffic, same persons might appear in different annotations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
There is a considerable performance difference for small sized pedestrians, as expected by the lower box recall.
“As could be expected by the lower box recall shown in Figure 4, there is a considerable performance difference for small sized pedestrians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6
By driving through a large part of Europe, during all four seasons, in most weather conditions (apart from heavy rain or snowfall), and during day and night, EuroCity Persons recorded very diverse backgrounds and person appearances.
“By driving through a large part of Europe, during all four seasons, in most weather conditions (apart from heavy rain or snowfall), and during day and night, we recorded very diverse backgrounds and person appearances, see Table 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Datasets captured in few countries and only in daylight and dry weather conditions hamper generalization to real-world applications.
- Findingown data§ 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6
Very crowded scenarios were collected in Lyon with on average 9.5 pedestrians per image.
“Very crowded scenarios have been collected in Lyon with on average 9.5 pedestrians per image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4
EuroCity Persons contains night-time scenes.
“It also contains night-time scenes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1
The EuroCity Persons dataset provides a large number of highly diverse, accurate and detailed annotations of pedestrians, cyclists and other riders in urban traffic scenes.
“In this paper, we introduce the EuroCity Persons dataset, which provides a large number of highly diverse, accurate and detailed annotations of pedestrians, cyclists and other riders in urban traffic scenes.”
- Also stated in: § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4 · plain
“We introduce the EuroCity Persons dataset, which provides a large number of highly diverse, accurate and detailed annotations of persons (pedestrians, cyclists, and other riders) in urban traffic scenes across Europe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1
EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than person datasets used previously for benchmarking, in terms of manual annotations.
“EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than person datasets used previously for benchmarking.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
“EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than person datasets used previously for benchmarking, in terms of manual annotations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
- Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Faster R-CNN variants trained and tested with original image resolution perform slightly worse for the reasonable and occluded test scenarios than other Faster R-CNN variants.
“The Faster R-CNN variants ( all origsize, baseline ) that are trained and tested with the original image resolution perform slightly worse for the reasonable and occluded test scenario than the other Faster R-CNN variants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1
EuroCity Persons contains over 238200 person instances manually labeled in over 47300 images.
“With over 238200 person instances manually labeled in over 47300 images, EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than person datasets used previously for benchmarking.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
“With over 238200 person instances manually labeled in over 47300 images, EuroCity Persons is nearly one order of magnitude larger than person datasets used previously for benchmarking, in terms of manual annotations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
- Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Faster R-CNN all performs slightly better than Faster R-CNN occluded on the occluded test scenario.
“It also performs slightly better than Faster R-CNN occluded on the occluded test scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 7
Faster R-CNN all evaluated on 1.3× upscaled images has higher recall for smaller pedestrians compared to Faster R-CNN all origsize.
“Boxes of Faster R-CNN all are evaluated on 1 . 3 × upscaled images in contrast to Faster RCNN all origsize resulting in a higher recall in particular for smaller pedestrians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Variants of the two stage method Faster R-CNN perform overall best on the three test scenarios.
“Variants of the two stage method Faster R-CNN perform overall best on the three test scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detection · p. 1
The EuroCity Persons images were collected on-board a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries.
“The images for this dataset were collected on-board a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries.”
- Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
“The images for this dataset were collected on-board a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries, see Figure 1 and Table 5.”
- Also stated in: § 3.1 Dataset Collection · p. 4 · plain
“We collected the images of the EuroCity Persons dataset from a moving vehicle in 31 cities of 12 European countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2 · plain
- Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
Faster R-CNN detection performance suffers from deleting and disturbing bounding box locations.
“The detection performance of Faster R-CNN suffers from deleting and disturbing the bounding box locations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
Deleting 25% of bounding boxes results in a miss-rate of 11.7 for Faster R-CNN.
“Deleting 25% of the bounding boxes results in a miss-rate of 11.7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9
Processing rates for RFCN, Faster R-CNN, SSD and YOLOv3 on non-upscaled test images were 1.2 fps, 1.7 fps, 2.4 fps and 3.8 fps, respectively.
“Processing rates for the RFCN, Faster R-CNN, SSD and YOLOv3 on non-upscaled test images were 1.2 fps , 1.7 fps , 2.4 fps and 3.8 fps , respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Pre-training with ECP is especially valuable for the hard or occluded cases, involving improvements of about 10 percentage points in LAMR.
“Pre-training with ECP is especially valuable for the hard or occluded cases, involving improvements of about 10 percentage points in LAMR .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
These benefits are larger than pre-training with CP.
“These benefits are larger than pre-training with CP.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
Detection performance deteriorates when not using ignore regions during training.
“In accordance with earlier findings [4], we observe that detection performance deteriorates when not using ignore regions during training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Small and occluded pedestrians are a further common source for false negatives.
“Small and occluded pedestrians are a further common source for false negatives as already shown by the small and occluded test scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
The orientation annotation deviation lies within the requirements of Section 3.2.
“We note that this lies within the requirements of Section 3.2 as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
In qualitative analysis there are false negatives where the head is occluded.
“In our qualitative analysis we have false negatives where the head is occluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
An IoU threshold of 0.5 is not sufficient to suppress detections that have very diverse aspects.
“We use an IoU threshold of 0.5 which is not sufficient to suppress detections that have very diverse aspects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
Table 11 shows that detection results decrease slightly for the multitask network with the Biternion loss.
“In contrast to [9] which shows that training multiple tasks together can improve the overall result, Table 11 shows that the detection results decrease slightly for the multitask network with the Biternion loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] [9] R. B. Girshick, 'Fast R-CNN,' in Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2015, pp. 14401448. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
The confusion of pedestrians and background is even stronger when OHEM is applied, as seen comparing R-FCN results with and without OHEM.
“This effect is even stronger when OHEM is applied as seen when comparing R-FCN results with and without OHEM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
The logarithmic relation between training set size and detection performance also holds on our benchmark for Faster R-CNN and SSD.
“We observe that logarithmic relation between training set size and detection performance also holds on our benchmark for Faster R-CNN and SSD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
The best results on CP were achieved by the Faster R-CNN model pretrained on ECP with a LAMR of 14.9.
“Again, the best results were achieved by the Faster R-CNN model pretrained on ECP with a LAMR of 14 . 9 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
The average deviation of the bounding box extents stays below 1.4 px for objects up to 200 px high.
“Figure 10 shows that the average deviation of the bounding box extents stays below 1.4 px for objects up to 200 px high”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
By adding riders as an additional class, pedestrian detection performance improves for the protocol which requires pedestrians to be classified as such (10.3 vs. 11.0).
“By adding riders as an additional class, one observes that the pedestrian detection performance improves for the protocol which requires pedestrians to be classified as such (10.3 vs. 11.0).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Because of the high IoU between pedestrians, not all of them can be detected because of the greedy NMS.
“Because of the high IoU between pedestrians not all of them can be detected because of the greedy NMS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Pre-training results in a decrease of 2, 9, and 7 percentage points in LAMR for the reasonable, small, occluded CP validation datasets, respectively, when compared to using the original CP training data set.
“Similarly, pre-training results in a decrease of 2, 9, and 7 percentage points in LAMR for the reasonable, small, occluded CP validation datasets, respectively, when compared to using the original CP training data set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
False negatives already occur for an IoU threshold of 0.5.
“These already occur for an IoU threshold of 0.5 as shown in the NMS repressing category.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
Faster RCNN achieved an average precision of 65.9 for pedestrians on the official KITTI test set for the moderate scenario.
“Faster RCNN achieved an average precision of 65.9 for pedestrians on the official KITTI test set for the moderate scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
Our model pre-trained on ECP achieved an average precision of 72.6 on the KITTI test set.
“Our model pre-trained on ECP achieved an average precision of 72.6 on the KITTI test set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
At a fppi of 0.3 for Faster R-CNN all on the reasonable setup, 230 missed annotations larger than 32 px were manually counted.
“At a fppi of 0.3 for Faster R-CNN all on the reasonable setup we manually count 230 missed annotation larger than 32 px .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
The model pretrained on ECP outperforms the CP based model with an average precision of 80.8.
“The model pretrained on ECP outperforms the CP based model with an average precision of 80 . 8 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
There is only a slight difference in performance when the network is trained to regress a bounding box for the rider alone or for the rider including the ride type.
“There is only a slight difference in performance when the network is trained to regress a bounding box for the rider alone or for the rider including the ride type.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9
Depictions and reflections are among the hardest error sources to take care off: at decreasing fppi the share of this error type increases.
“In terms of classification errors, depictions and reflections are among the hardest error sources to take care off: at decreasing fppi the share of this error type increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Pre-training on ECP and fine-tuning on a smaller target dataset (KITTI, CP) yields better results than training solely on the target dataset.
“pre-training on ECP and fine-tuning (post-training) on a smaller target dataset (KITTI, CP) yields better results than training solely on the target dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.2 Generalization Capabilities · p. 9
CityPersons and EuroCity Persons differ regarding annotation bias, as the aspect ratios of all bounding boxes provided by CP are the same in contrast to ECP.
“Still they differ regarding annotation bias, as the aspect ratios of all bounding boxes provided by CP are the same in contrast to ECP (cf. Section 3.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
Training on daytime and testing on night-time gives significantly worse results than training and testing on the same time-of-day.
“Table 10 shows that training on daytime and testing on night-time gives significantly worse results than training and testing on the same time-of-day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
Due to dataset biases, solely training on a dataset from the other domain without fine-tuning results in worse detection performance.
“However, due to the dataset biases solely training on a dataset from the other domain without fine-tuning results in worse detection performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
Even at training data sizes about one order of magnitude larger than existing ones, considered state-of-the-art deep learning methods (Faster R-CNN and SSD) do not saturate in detection performance.
“Even at the new training data sizes that are about one order of magnitude larger than previous ones, the considered deep learning methods do not saturate in detection performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
With 75% of training samples a LAMR of 10.0 is achieved.
“Note that with 75% of the training samples a LAMR of 10.0 is achieved (see Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
Placing hallucinations at random locations only slightly influences overall detection performance.
“Placing hallucinations at random locations only slightly influences the overall detection performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9
Of the touched groundtruth samples, an increasing proportion is non-matched for decreasing fppi.
“Of these touched groundtruth samples, an increasing proportion is non-matched, for decreasing fppi .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Pre-training results in an increase of 5, 8, and 11 percentage points in average precision for the easy, moderate and hard KITTI validation datasets, respectively, when compared to using the original KITTI training data set.
“Pre-training results in an increase of 5, 8, and 11 percentage points in average precision for the easy, moderate and hard KITTI validation datasets, respectively, when compared to using the original KITTI training data set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
For the reasonable and small test scenario the LAMR drops by about two points when not using ignore regions.
“For the reasonable and small test scenario the LAMR drops by about two points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Certain pedestrian poses and aspect ratios can lead to multiple detections for the same pedestrian.
“Certain pedestrian poses and aspect ratios can lead to multiple detections for the same pedestrian as shown in the Multidetections category.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
When using CP to pretrain for KITTI and vice versa, detection performance is worse than when using ECP for pre-training.
“On the other hand, when using CP to pretrain for KITTI and vice versa, the detection performance is worse than when using ECP for pre-training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8
Clothes, depictions and reflections are main sources for confusion with real pedestrians and thus for false positives.
“As can be seen, clothes, depictions and reflections are main sources for confusion with real pedestrians and thus for false positives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
These findings not only hold on the validation datasets.
“These findings not only hold on the validation datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14
Adding 10% hallucinations that more resemble pedestrians ('false positives') results in a more significant drop in performance of 3.3 points.
“Adding 10% hallucinations that more resemble pedestrians ('false positives') result in a more significant drop in performance of 3.3 points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13
Using the more conservative 30% figure, there are additional 99 missed annotations for pedestrians larger than 32 px, bringing the total missed annotation to 329.
“Using the more conservative 30% figure, we estimate that, in fact, there are additional 99 missed annotations for pedestrians larger than 32 px, bringing the total missed annotation to 329.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
Faster R-CNN pretrained on CP achieves an average precision of 77.5 on the moderate setting of the KITTI benchmark.
“For the moderate setting of the KITTI benchmark the Faster R-CNN pretrained on CP achieves an average precision of 77 . 5 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
We included in this benchmark the orientation estimation of the overall body.
“In preparation for this, we included in this benchmark the orientation estimation of the overall body”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
At equal training set sizes, night-time performance is worse (a LAMR of four points higher) than day-time.
“Comparing day- and night-time detection performance, one observes from Table 10 that at equal training set sizes, night-time performance is worse (a LAMR of four points higher).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
Night-performance is a few percentage points lower than day-time performance.
“The experiments also showed that night-performance is a few percentage points lower than day-time performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
In our case correct ignore region handling boosts performance by 1.5 points.
“In our case it boosts performance by 1 . 5 points (see Table 11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Experiments suggest there is a bias derived from large geographical region.
“Foremost, experiments suggest that there is indeed a bias derived from large geographical region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
A visual inspection shows that remaining errors are indeed 'hard', even for a human.
“A visual inspection shows that the remaining errors are indeed 'hard', even for a human, see Table 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
The existence of a bias (geographical) is statistically significant with a confidence interval of 99%.
“We found that the existence of a bias is statistically significant with a confidence interval of 99%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
These confusions result in high scoring false positives also for sizes larger than 80 px.
“These confusions result in high scoring false positives also for sizes larger than 80 px .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
Approximately 75% of false positives at 0.3 fppi analyzed in Figure 6 are smaller than 80 pixels.
“Approximately 75% of the false positives at 0.3 fppi analyzed in Figure 6 are smaller than 80 pixels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
Depictions, reflections and clothes are often confused with real pedestrians.
“We show quantitatively in Figure 6 and qualitatively in Table 6 that depictions, reflections and clothes are often confused with real pedestrians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
We have created the new EuroCity Persons dataset, which takes annotations of persons in urban traffic scenes to a new level in terms of quantity, diversity and detail.
“We have created the new EuroCity Persons dataset, which takes annotations of persons in urban traffic scenes to a new level in terms of quantity, diversity and detail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Performance still improves with increasing training set size with a decent gradient.
“Our study shows that performance still improves with increasing training set size with a decent gradient (i.e. Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
The orientation estimation of overall body can be jointly trained with detection task at minimal performance loss.
“and showed that the latter can be jointly trained with the detection task at minimal performance loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Detection rate increases to 97% at a distance of 25 m (object height 100 px).
“See Figure 11, the detection rate increases to 97% at a distance of 25 m (object height 100 px ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Correct ignore region handling has an impact on detection performance.
“As in [4] we show that a correct ignore region handling has an impact on detection performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
Detectors pre-trained with new dataset and fine-tuned on target dataset yield superior performance than those trained on target dataset only (improvements on KITTI and CityPersons by 5-11 and 2-9 points, respectively).
“In experiments on transfer learning, we showed that detectors pre-trained with the new dataset and finetuned on a target dataset, yield superior performance than those trained on the target dataset only (improvements on KITTI and CityPersons by 5-11 and 2-9 points, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Detectors improve their performance with decreasing distance (increasing object size).
“The detectors improve their performance with decreasing distance (increasing object size).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
Small objects are still very challenging despite great amount of small sized pedestrians in training dataset.
“In Figure 11 and in our baseline experiments we show that small objects are still very challenging despite the great amount of small sized pedestrians present in our training dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
This difference is enlarged when the entire day- and night-time training sets of ECP are used.
“This difference is enlarged when the entire dayand night-time training sets of ECP are used as the former is an order of magnitude larger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
When training detection network jointly for pedestrians and riders, confusions between two person classes can be reduced.
“When training a detection network jointly for pedestrians and riders we have already shown that confusions between the two person classes can be reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
This is a larger difference than that between the performances using 75% and 100% of the training data in Figure 8.
“This is a larger difference than that between the performances using 75% and 100% of the training data in Figure 8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Jointly trained detection models for riders and pedestrians achieve a lower miss rate for the pedestrian class than models trained for pedestrians-only, when the precise class is enforced.
“In our experiments, the jointly trained detection models for riders and pedestrians achieve a lower miss rate for the pedestrian class, than models trained for pedestrians-only, when the precise class is enforced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
Adding orientation estimation to object detection lowers detection performance by a single percentage point for the Biternion loss.
“Adding orientation estimation to object detection lowers the detection performance by a single percentage point for the Biternion loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation§ 3.1 Dataset Collection · p. 4
The EuroCity Persons detection benchmark was sampled by extracting every 80th frame without further filtering to limit selection bias.
“To limit selection bias [15], we extracted every 80-th frame for our detection benchmark without further filtering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] [15] A. Torralba and A. A. Efros, 'Unbiased look at dataset bias,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , June 2011, pp. 1521-1528. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.3 Data Subsets · p. 6
The validation set was placed intermittently with the training and test sets to avoid the latter two containing the same physical person.
“By placing furthermore the validation set intermittently with the training and test, it was all but avoided that the latter two would contain the same physical person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2
EuroCity Persons annotations are overall accurate due to the implemented quality control procedures.
“Finally, thanks to the implemented quality control procedures, annotations are overall accurate.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5 · plain
“Annotations were double checked by a quality validation team that was disjoint from the annotation team. If needed, several feedback iterations were run between the teams to achieve a consolidated outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5 · plain
- Premisereasoning§ 2.1 Datasets · p. 2
In terms of annotation quantity and data diversity, CityPersons and Tsinghua-Daimler Cyclist had, so far, the most to offer for the pedestrian and riders classes.
“In terms of the annotation quantity and data diversity, CityPersons [4] and TsinghuaDaimler Cyclist [5] had, so far, the most to offer for the pedestrian and the riders class.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] [5] X. Li, F. Flohr, Y. Yang, H. Xiong, M. Braun, S. Pan, K. Li, and D. M. Gavrila, 'A New Benchmark for Vison-Based Cyclist Detection,' in IEEE Intell. Veh , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.3 Data Subsets · p. 6
Sequences were split only at points where the recording vehicle had a speed larger than 7 km/h to make the test, validation, and training sets disjunct in terms of people.
“To facilitate that the test, validation and training sets are disjunct in terms of people we only splitted sequences at points in time where the recording vehicle had a speed larger than 7 km/h .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 7
Faster R-CNN can reach top performance for pedestrian detection if it is properly optimized.
“As shown in [4], it can reach top performance for pedestrian detection if it is properly optimized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
The generalization capabilities needed for transfer learning can be addressed to four dataset aspects: diversity, quantity, accuracy, and detail.
“We argue that the generalization capabilities needed for transfer learning shown in the last section can be addressed to four dataset aspects, namely, diversity, quantity, accuracy, and detail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Current deep learning methods need to adapt to these biases first, even if the same vision task is involved.
“Current deep learning methods need to adapt to these biases first, even if the same vision task is involved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 Generalization Capabilities · p. 9
Because of inherent dataset biases, models trained on one dataset have to be fine-tuned to be applicable on other datasets.
“Because of these inherent dataset biases models trained on one dataset have to be fine-tuned to be applicable on other datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11
Despite dataset biases, models pre-trained on ECP learned general features for pedestrian detection useful for other datasets after finetuning.
“Despite the dataset biases, the models were able to learn general features for the task of pedestrians detection when pre-trained on ECP which proves useful for other datasets as well after finetuning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
With a confidence interval of 99%, the null-hypothesis (the non-existence of a regional bias) can be rejected for both regions.
“Hence, with a confidence interval of 99% , the null-hypothesis (the non-existence of a regional bias) can be rejected for both regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
The fact that saturation does not occur can be attributed to the diversity of the data.
“The fact that saturation does not occur can be attributed to the diversity of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
Overall results are worse than those of other experiments due to the comparatively small training sets used.
“Overall results are worse than those of other experiments due to the comparatively small training sets used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
There is a logarithmic relation between the amount of training data and the performance of deep learning methods.
“[7] shows a logarithmic relation between the amount of training data and the performance of deep learning methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] [7] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Data still remains a driving factor for person detection performance in urban traffic scenes.
“A main outcome from the EuroCity Persons (ECP) experiments is that data still remains a driving factor for the person detection performance in urban traffic scenes”
- Also stated in: § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16 · plain
“The experiments show that data is still a driving factor for the person detection performance in urban traffic scenes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16 · plain
- Premisecitation§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12
Resampling of a dataset can be applied to evaluate the significance of benchmark results.
“[76] shows that resampling of a dataset can be applied to evaluate the significance of benchmark results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] [76] J. Demˇ sar, 'Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets,' Journal of Machine Learning Research , pp. 1-30, 2006. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14
Existing biases in current databases are too strong to allow avoiding a fine-tuning step on the target dataset altogether; this holds even for a much larger source training dataset like ECP.
“existing biases in current databases are too strong to allow avoiding a fine-tuning step on the target dataset altogether; this holds even for a much larger source training dataset like ECP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
System performance regarding person detection in urban traffic settings has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade.
“System performance regarding person detection in urban traffic settings has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade; it is now closing in on human performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Some false positives can be eliminated when taking advantage of known scene geometry constraints.
“Second, some false positives can be eliminated, when taking advantage of known scene geometry constraints (e.g. pedestrians or riders should be on the ground plane, their heights should be physically plausible when accounting for perspective mapping).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
In the evaluation protocol of [4], this case is not considered as riders are always handled as ignore regions.
“In the evaluation protocol of [4] this case is not considered as riders are always handled as ignore regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
More person training data is especially helpful in non-standard poses, in rainy or nighttime conditions, or under partial occlusions.
“More person training data is especially helpful in non-standard poses, in rainy or nighttime conditions, or under partial occlusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
The way annotations are performed proves to be important.
“The way annotations are performed proves to be important as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Current single-frame pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.
“A recent paper [1] finds that current single-frame pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] [1] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, M. Omran, J. Hosang, and B. Schiele, 'Towards reaching human performance in pedestrian detection,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 973-985, 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
Tracking can suppress such false positives ([11] shows a reduction by up to 37%).
“Tracking can suppress such false positives ( [11] shows a reduction by up to 37%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] M. Enzweiler and D. M. Gavrila, 'Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 21792195, 2009. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
There is a potential for substantial further performance improvement.
“Thus there is a potential for a substantial further performance improvement; an improvement which would be important with the advent of fully self-driving vehicles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
A further doubling of current training size (110000 pedestrians) is projected to yield a reduction of LAMR from 9.4 to about 7.6 points.
“A further doubling of the current training size (110000 pedestrians) is projected to yield a reduction of the LAMR from 9.4 to about 7.6 points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
It is beneficial to train specific detectors for classes that otherwise might be confused with the target class.
“We go beyond [4] to show that it is beneficial to train specific detectors for classes that otherwise might be confused with the target class.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
Most top performing methods of common generic object detection benchmarks depend on a simple greedy NMS [77].
“Interestingly, most top performing methods of the common generic object detection benchmarks depend on a simple greedy non-maximum suppression (NMS) [77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] [77] N. Bodla, B. Singh, R. Chellappa, and L. S. Davis, 'Soft-NMS improving object detection with one line of code,' in Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16
It is now closing in on human performance.
“System performance regarding person detection in urban traffic settings has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade; it is now closing in on human performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
More data remains part of the solution on how to improve performance.
“More data remains part of the solution on how to improve performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16
This NMS poses a problem for overlapping objects e.g. in pedestrian groups.
“This NMS poses a problem for overlapping objects e.g. in pedestrian groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15
The claim that state-of-the-art detection performance is far away from practical use for vehicle application is incorrect.
“State-of-the-art detection performance (e.g. correct detection around 90% at 0 . 1 -0 . 3 fppi ) is sometimes cited as evidence that performance is far away from practical use for the vehicle application. This is incorrect, as can be readily inferred from the fact that there are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.
- Rests on an assumption: Current commercial systems are in the context of driver assistance, meaning that a correct detection performance of about 90% is acceptable, as long as the false alarm rate is essentially zero.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
- May combine two claims. 41
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8The original resolution Faster R-CNN variants run 66% faster during training and testing.
“Still, they run 66% faster during training and testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8Faster R-CNN small performs best on the corresponding small test scenario, and also slightly better on the reasonable setup.
“Faster R-CNN small performs best on the corresponding small test scenario, and interestingly also slightly better on the reasonable setup.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6The lowest average number of pedestrians per city in EuroCity Persons (1.8) occurred in Leipzig, likely due to rainy weather during recording.
“For example, the lowest average number of pedestrians per city (1.8) occurred in Leipzig likely due to the rainy weather during recording.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8OHEM proves useful when comparing results for the two R-FCN variants with enabled and disabled OHEM for the occluded scenario.
“OHEM proves useful when comparing results for the two R-FCN variants with enabled and disabled OHEM for the occluded scenario.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2EuroCity Persons annotations extend beyond bounding boxes and include tags for occlusion/truncation, overall body orientations, and a variety of object- and image-related tags.
“EuroCity Persons furthermore offers detailed annotations; besides bounding box information, it includes tags for occlusion/truncation and annotates body orientation (the latter has relevance for object tracking and path prediction).”
- Also stated in: § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4 · plain
“Annotations extend beyond bounding boxes and include overall body orientations and a variety of object- and image-related tags.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 3.1 Dataset Collection · p. 4Each city recording in EuroCity Persons lasted on average 1.7 hours.
“We collected 53 hours of image data in total, for an average of 1.7 hours per city.”
- Also stated in: § 3.3 Data Subsets · p. 5 · plain
“Each city recording lasted on average 1.7 hours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.3 Data Subsets · p. 5 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6Recordings at night-time in EuroCity Persons suffer from low contrast, color loss and motion blur.
“Recordings at night-time suffer from low contrast, color loss and motion blur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2EuroCity Persons provides a new level of data diversity due to its comparatively large geographic coverage, recordings during both day and night-time, and recordings during all four seasons.
“Due to its comparatively large geographic coverage, its recordings during both day and night-time, and during all four seasons (light/short summer to thick/long winter clothing) it provides a new level of data diversity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Datasets captured in few countries and only in daylight and dry weather conditions hamper generalization to real-world applications.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.4 Dataset Characteristics · p. 6EuroCity Persons contains challenging occlusions and overlapping objects that complicate non-maximum suppression, which are missing in KITTI and Caltech where on average there is about one pedestrian per frame.
“These imply challenging occlusions and overlapping objects that complicate non-maximum suppression (these difficult scenarios are missing in KITTI and Caltech, where on average there is about one pedestrian per frame).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13In terms of orientation angle, the average deviation starts at 20 degrees for object sizes of 40 px and reduces to about 10 degrees for object sizes larger than 100 px.
“Figure 9 shows that in terms of orientation angle, the average deviation starts at 20 degrees for object sizes of 40 px and reduces to about 10 degrees for object sizes larger than 100 px .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8Rare poses or pedestrians leaning on bicycles are further challenges.
“Further challenges are rare poses or pedestrians leaning on bicycles as shown in the Others group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11Using the exact same settings as in [4], we arrive at a LAMR of 12.2, which is improved by ECP pre-training to 10.9.
“If we use the exact same settings as in [4], we arrive at an even better LAMR of 12.2, which is improved by ECP pre-training to 10.9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14The ECP dataset covers a large geographical region, day and night, and different weather conditions.
“The ECP dataset covers a large geographical region, day and night, and different weather conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13The absolute detection performance for pedestrians and riders is quite similar although there are 10 times more pedestrians than riders in the training dataset.
“The absolute detection performance for pedestrians and riders is quite similar although there are 10 times more pedestrians than riders in our training dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13Using the aggregated AOS metric for the reasonable test scenario, the score is 86.0 for the L1 loss and 86.7 for the Biternion loss.
“Using the aggregated AOS metric from Section 3.5 for the reasonable test scenario we get a score of 86.0 for the L1 loss and 86.7 for the Biternion loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13The Biternion loss is superior to the L1 loss as it does not suffer from the periodicity of an orientation angle.
“The Biternion loss is superior to the L1 loss as it does not suffer from the periodicity of an orientation angle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11Pre-training on KITTI data has no influence on detection performance on the CP benchmark, which remains at a LAMR of 17.2.
“The same findings hold for the CP benchmark, on which pre-training on KITTI data has no influence on the detection performance that remains at a LAMR of 17 . 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9The share of false positives touching ground-truth samples remains approximately the same for the entire fppi range.
“The share of false positives touching ground-truth samples remains approximately the same for the entire fppi range.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13If neighboring classes are counted as false positives, detection performance decreases: the LAMR for the baseline method increases from 9.4 to 11.0.
“If these neighboring classes are instead counted as false positives, detection performance decreases as expected: the LAMR for our baseline method increases from 9.4 to 11.0, as shown in Table 12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9The share of larger other-background objects increases with decreasing fppi.
“Also the share of larger other-background objects increases with decreasing fppi .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13The miss-rate for Faster R-CNN all at this fppi is about 10% for the small test scenario and about 30% for the occluded test scenario.
“However, the miss-rate for Faster R-CNN all at this fppi is about 10% for the small test scenario and about 30% for the occluded test scenario.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9Localization errors account for about 60% of all errors at a high fppi of 6, decreasing to about 40% for a low fppi rate of 4×10^-3.
“Figure 6 shows that localization errors account for about 60% of all errors at a high fppi of 6, decreasing to about 40% for a low fppi rate of 4 × 10 -3 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 13As there are about 48000 pedestrians in the test dataset, this corresponds to 0.7% missed annotations, which lies within the 1% quality requirement of Section 3.2.
“As there are about 48000 pedestrians in the test dataset, this corresponds to 0.7% missed annotations, which lies within the 1% quality requirement of Section 3.2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12For the WE and EE test sets, the p-values are 0.0098 and 0.0020, respectively.
“For the WE and EE test sets, these values are 0 . 0098 and 0 . 0020 , respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9The share of false positives touching ignore regions is similar for a large fppi range but decreases somewhat for fppi below 10^-2.
“The share of false positives touching ignore regions is similar for a large fppi range but decreases somewhat for fppi below 10 -2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16When selecting IoU threshold there is a tradeoff between recall and precision as shown in Table 6.
“When selecting the IoU threshold there is a tradeoff between recall and precision as shown in Table 6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16We found a variant of Faster R-CNN to perform overall best, with a log-average-miss-rate of 8.1, 17.1 and 33.9 on the reasonable, small and occluded test scenario, respectively.
“we found a variant of Faster R-CNN to perform overall best, with a log-averagemiss-rate of 8.1, 17.1 and 33.9 on the reasonable, small and occluded test scenario, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15Many false positives arise by accidental overlaying of structures at different depths, and are not consistent over time when observed from a moving camera.
“Third, many false positives arise by an accidental overlaying of structures at different depths, and are not consistent over time when observed from a moving camera.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16A statistically significant bias exists on detection performance across large-scale regions in Europe, resulting in performance variations of the same order.
“Experimental results furthermore indicate that a statistically significant bias exists on detection performance across largescale regions in Europe, resulting in performance variations of the same order.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5The amount of missed and hallucinated objects in EuroCity Persons annotations were each to lie within 1% of the annotated number.
“The amount of missed and hallucinated objects were each to lie within 1% of the annotated number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1 Datasets · p. 2Caltech lists a large number of pedestrian annotations, but only an unspecified subset were done manually; the number of manual annotations is estimated to be an order of magnitude smaller, with about 2300 unique persons.
“Although Caltech [2] lists a large number of pedestrian annotations, only an unspecified subset of these annotations were done manually, the remainder was obtained by interpolation (we estimate the number of manual annotations to be an order of magnitude smaller). In total there are about 2300 unique persons in this dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2The comparatively small size of the training data in Caltech and KITTI makes these benchmarks prone to dataset bias and over-fitting.
“The comparatively small size of the training data (i.e. several thousands samples) furthermore makes these benchmarks prone to dataset bias and to over-fitting [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] [15] A. Torralba and A. A. Efros, 'Unbiased look at dataset bias,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , June 2011, pp. 1521-1528. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5EuroCity Persons annotations were double checked by a quality validation team that was disjoint from the annotation team.
“Annotations were double checked by a quality validation team that was disjoint from the annotation team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 7Many recent pedestrian detection methods are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.
“Many recent pedestrian detection methods [62], [63], [71], [55], [70], [57], [56] are extensions of Fast/Faster R-CNN and profit from the basic concepts of these methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [62] [62] J. Li, X. Liang, Y. Wei, T. Xu, J. Feng, and S. Yan, 'Perceptual generative adversarial networks for small object detection,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 1951-1959. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [63] [63] S. Huang and D. Ramanan, 'Expecting the unexpected: Training detectors for unusual pedestrians with adversarial imposters,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 4664-4673. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] [71] J. Mao, T. Xiao, Y. Jiang, and Z. Cao, 'What can help pedestrian detection?' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017, pp. 6034-6043. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 2CityPersons concluded that more training data is necessary for recent high-capacity deep learning architectures.
“Although these data additions are helpful, [4] conclude that more training data is necessary for the recent high-capacity deep learning architectures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5All EuroCity Persons annotations were manually performed without automated support to avoid undesirable bias towards certain algorithms during benchmarking.
“All annotations were manually performed; no automated support was used, as it might introduce an undesirable bias towards certain algorithms during benchmarking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 7YOLOv3's design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects compared to its predecessors.
“We evaluate its latest extension YOLOv3 [34], as in comparison with its predecessors, its design is promising regarding the detection of smaller objects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] [34] J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, 'Yolov3: An incremental improvement,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 , 2018. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5Annotators were asked to be accurate within two pixels for bounding box sides (apart from ignore regions) and within 20 degrees for orientation.
“Annotators were asked to be accurate within two pixels for bounding box sides (apart from ignore regions) and within 20 degrees for orientation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2.1 Datasets · p. 2Cyclist and other riders annotations are missing in Caltech, and orientation annotations are missing in both Caltech and CityPersons.
“Cyclist and other riders annotations are missing in the Caltech dataset, and orientation annotations are missing in both Caltech and CityPersons datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown data§ 2.4 Main Contributions · p. 4Detectors trained with EuroCity Persons generalize to previous datasets, proving the dataset's usefulness.
“We prove the generalization capabilities of detectors trained with the new dataset and thereby its usefulness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 3.2 Dataset Annotation · p. 5All visible persons were annotated in every sampled frame to avoid flawed generation of background samples during training and bootstrapping.
“For every sampled frame, all visible persons were annotated; otherwise, missed annotations could lead to the flawed generation of background samples during training and bootstrapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
Premisecitation§ 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1Current pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.
“A recent paper [1] argues that current pedestrian detection performance lags that of an attentive human by an order of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] [1] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, M. Omran, J. Hosang, and B. Schiele, 'Towards reaching human performance in pedestrian detection,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 973-985, 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8At the end of training only the best snapshot on the validation dataset is selected and evaluated on the test dataset, to avoid optimizing on the latter.
“At the end of training only the best snapshot on the validation dataset is selected and evaluated on the test dataset, to avoid optimizing on the latter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.1 Datasets · p. 2KITTI, Caltech and TDC datasets have been collected in one city only; CityPersons was recorded in 27 different cities but, apart from Strasbourg and Zurich, covers only Germany and recordings were not made throughout all seasons.
“KITTI, Caltech and TDC datasets have been collected in one city only. CityPersons was recorded in 27 different cities but, apart of Strasbourg and Zurich, it covers only Germany and recordings were not made throughout all seasons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] [3] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, 'Are We Ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2012, pp. 3354-3361. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] [2] P. Doll´ ar, C. Wojek, B. Schiele, and P. Perona, 'Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 743-761, 2012. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5] [5] X. Li, F. Flohr, Y. Yang, H. Xiong, M. Braun, S. Pan, K. Li, and D. M. Gavrila, 'A New Benchmark for Vison-Based Cyclist Detection,' in IEEE Intell. Veh , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11Using transfer learning to pretrain a network on generic data and fine-tune on the target domain is widely applied and used to increase overall performance.
“Using transfer learning to pretrain a network on generic data and fine-tune on the target domain is widely applied and used to increase overall performance [74], [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [74] [74] J. Yosinski, J. Clune, Y. Bengio, and H. Lipson, 'How transferable are features in deep neural networks?' in Adv. in NIPS , 2014, pp. 3320-3328. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [75] [75] A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson, 'CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2014, pp. 512-519. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 14Pedestrians without bounding box labels may be used as background samples during training, which results in confusion of pedestrians and background during testing.
“Pedestrians without bounding box labels may be used as background samples during training which results in the confusion of pedestrians and background during testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12They propose to focus on the datasets instead of applying more and more bells and whistles to recent methods resulting in the danger to overfit on existing datasets.
“Thus, they propose to focus on the datasets instead of applying more and more bells and whistles to recent methods resulting in the danger to overfit on existing datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] [7] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8A higher IoU threshold would result in more false negatives.
“On the other hand, a higher IoU threshold would result in more false negatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 9Possible objects inside ignore regions seem to lead to erroneous detections in their surroundings.
“Possible objects inside these ignore regions seem to lead to erroneous detections in their surroundings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8Head-occluded cases are particularly challenging for pedestrian detection methods, as these cases are quite rare in the training dataset.
“These are particularly challenging for pedestrian detection methods, as these cases are quite rare in the training dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11The superior performance on both KITTI and CP datasets when using ECP for pre-training indicates a high dataset diversity; models trained on this dataset will have increased generalization capabilities.
“The superior performance on both KITTI and CP datasets, when using ECP for pre-training indicates a high dataset diversity; models trained on this dataset will have increased generalization capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ False Positives (Image Detail) · p. 11The LAMR listed in [4] for training and testing on CP was 12.8 rather than 17.2 listed here; the difference arises from a difference in reasonable settings used.
“Note that the LAMR listed in [4] for training and testing on CP was 12.8 rather than 17.2 listed here. The difference arises from a difference in reasonable settings used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ 4.3 Dataset Aspects · p. 12Pushing performance boundaries by using better datasets is not yet at its end.
“As stated in [7] pushing performance boundaries by using better datasets is not yet at its end.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] [7] C. Sun, A. Shrivastava, S. Singh, and A. Gupta, 'Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era,' Proc. IEEE ICCV , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Baselines · p. 8NMS is an important part of many deep learning methods that is usually not trained but has a great influence on detection performance.
“Thus, NMS is an important part of many deep learning methods that is usually not trained but has a great influence on detection performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16The three steps proposal generation, classification/bounding box regression, and NMS would finally be combined in a true end-to-end approach.
“Thus, the three steps proposal generation, classification/bounding box regression, and NMS would finally be combined in a true end-to-end approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15The drop in recall for pedestrians closer than 8 m could be due to the headlights of the recording vehicle.
“The drop in recall for pedestrians closer than 8 m could be due to the headlights of the recording vehicle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Such an approach could even switch on a per frame basis between sub-models, e.g. when sudden change in lighting.
“Such an approach could even switch on a per frame basis between sub-models, e.g. when there is a sudden change in lighting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15More training data is especially helpful for persons in nonstandard poses, in rainy or night-time conditions, or under partial occlusions.
“More training data is especially helpful for persons in nonstandard poses, in rainy or night-time conditions, or under partial occlusions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16That necessitates design of appropriate multi-task deep nets that more effectively incorporate global scene context.
“That necessitates the design of appropriate multi-task deep nets that more effectively incorporate global scene context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16We provided some insights regarding effect of annotation accuracy on performance that could be useful for future annotation efforts.
“We provided some insights regarding the effect of annotation accuracy on performance that could be useful for future annotation efforts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 14This is in accordance with earlier experiments on transfer learning on a smaller scale by [4].
“This is in accordance with earlier experiments on transfer learning on a smaller scale by [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] S. Zhang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection,' Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16In [78] a neural network is trained to rescore detections, which renders a further NMS stage unnecessary.
“In [78] a neural network is trained to rescore detections, which renders a further NMS stage unnecessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Proposal boxes are classified independently of each other resulting in multiple detections for same object, particularly if proposals share similar image locations.
“Still, the proposal boxes are classified independently of each other resulting in multiple detections for the same object in particular if the proposals share similar image locations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.
- Rests on an assumption: There is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16The neural network solely relies on bounding box locations and confidence scores as input.
“Still, the neural network solely relies on bounding box locations and confidence scores as input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15Performance has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade, in terms of reduction of number of false positives at given correct detection rate, comparing best-performer in this paper (R-CNN) with early benchmark [11], albeit different datasets.
“When comparing its performance with that of the best-performer in this paper, the R-CNN, one observes that performance has improved by an order of magnitude over the past decade, in terms of the reduction of the number of false positives at given correct detection rate, albeit dealing with two different datasets of urban traffic (Figure 8 in [11] vs. Figure 5 here).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] M. Enzweiler and D. M. Gavrila, 'Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 21792195, 2009. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone given§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16Development of appropriate multi-task deep networks, which combine a holistic approach to scene understanding with specialized person detection, taking advantage of known bias (geolocation, time of day, weather condition), seems promising.
“The development of appropriate multi-task deep networks, which combine a holistic approach to scene understanding with specialized person detection, taking advantage of known bias (geolocation, time of day, weather condition) seem promising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Lenseflares might occur from one frame to another when vehicle turns into direction of sun.
“For example lenseflares might occur from one frame to another when the vehicle turns into the direction of the sun.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Systems like [79] take into account additional pose information.
“Systems like [79] come into play which take into account additional pose information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] [79] J. F. P. Kooij, N. Schneider, F. Flohr, and D. M. Gavrila, 'Contextbased pedestrian path prediction,' in Proc. of the ECCV , 2014, pp. 618-633. <!-- image --> 品 <!-- image --> <!-- image --> <!-- image --> Markus Braun Markus Braun received the M.Sc. degree in computer science from Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, in 2015. Since then he is working toward the Ph.D. degree at TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands. He is also currently with Daimler Research and Development in the Environment Perception department, Ulm, Germany. His research interests include machine learning and video
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 6 CONCLUSIONS · p. 16Future improvement will in part still come from additional data.
“Future improvement will in part still come from additional data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16An ensemble of specialized deep learning models could take advantage of known bias (particular location and digital maps, weather, time of day).
“An ensemble of specialized deep learning models could take advantage of known bias (particular location and digital maps, weather, time of day).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15Headlights could result in very bright spots for the lower body of pedestrians and complicate detection.
“These could result in very bright spots for the lower body of pedestrians and complicate detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16As it is already a neural network architecture it can easily be integrated into existing detection networks.
“As it is already a neural network architecture it can easily be integrated into existing detection networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Better solutions are needed to provide accurate localization in presence of multiple persons and significant occlusion.
“In terms of vision methods, better solutions are needed to provide accurate localization in the presence of multiple persons and significant occlusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15The best performer on an early benchmark [11] was a method based on HOG features and SVM classifier.
“When viewed in historic context, the bestperformer on an early benchmark [11] was a method based on HOG features and SVM classifier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] [11] M. Enzweiler and D. M. Gavrila, 'Monocular pedestrian detection: Survey and experiments,' IEEE TPAMI , vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 21792195, 2009. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15Vehicle actuation (braking, steering) does not solely rely on monocular object detection.
“Thus vehicle actuation (braking, steering) does not solely rely on monocular object detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationcitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Doing so the network could be informed about how many objects are present.
“Doing so the network could be informed about how many objects are present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16Utilizing already annotated reflections and depictions as additional classes during training could improve discrimination performance.
“Utilizing the already annotated reflections and depictions as additional classes during training could improve the discrimination performance as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15Not all errors are equal in vehicle application; errors increasingly matter when they involve objects close to the vehicle.
“First, other than we assume in this study, not all errors are equal in the vehicle application. Errors increasingly matter when they involve objects close to the vehicle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown data§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 15The found relations between annotation quality and quantity and detection performance, together with a price tag for annotations at various quality levels, can help optimizing requirement specification for dataset annotation.
“The found relations between annotation quality and quantity on one hand and detection performance on the other (i.e. Table 13), together with a price tag for annotations at various quality levels can help optimizing the requirement specification for dataset annotation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 5 DISCUSSION · p. 16[78] proposes to incorporate image features in future works.
“To further improve the performance [78] proposes to incorporate image features in future works.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] [78] J. Hosang, R. Benenson, and B. Schiele, 'Learning non-maximum suppression,' in Proc. IEEE CVPR , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Overall object orientation is an important cue for predicting future motion of persons in traffic scenes.
“The overall object orientation is an important cue for the prediction of future motion of persons in traffic scenes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Datasets captured in few countries and only in daylight and dry weather conditions hamper generalization to real-world applications.
“The before-mentioned datasets were captured in few countries ( 1 -3 ), and in daylight and dry weather conditions only; this hampers generalization to real world applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Top ranking methods on KITTI and Caltech use deep convolutional neural networks.
“As the top ranking methods on KITTI and Caltech use deep convolutional neural networks, we select our baselines among these methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One stage methods often trade faster inference against a lower detection accuracy.
“The one stage methods often trade faster inference against a lower detection accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An object without any matching anchor box or default box can neither be used for training nor detected during testing in the evaluated methods.
“All four methods evaluated have in common that an object without any matching anchor box or default box can neither be used for training nor detected during testing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Training with very small or strongly occluded samples could lead to models detecting a lot more false positives.
“Training with very small or strongly occluded samples could lead to models detecting a lot more false positives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.
“One of the main differences between Faster R-CNN and R-FCN is the use of the bootstrapping method OHEM.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.
“Non-maximum suppression (NMS) is used by Faster R-CNN and other deep learning methods to suppress multiple detections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In street scenarios usually only the lower part of a pedestrian is occluded due to parked cars or other obstacles.
“In street scenarios usually only the lower part of a pedestrian is occluded due to parked cars or other obstacles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A dataset with a reduced bias should better capture the true world, and result in superior generalization capabilities of the detectors which are trained on this dataset.
“Adataset with a reduced bias should better capture the true world, and result in superior generalization capabilities of the detectors which are trained on this dataset.”
The paper relies on this without support.
KITTI and EuroCity Persons differ in camera types used for recording.
“KITTI and EuroCity Persons for example differ in camera types used for recording.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CityPersons (CP) and EuroCity Persons (ECP) datasets have been recorded with similar cameras.
“The CityPersons (CP) and EuroCity Persons (ECP) datasets have been recorded with similar cameras.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Body orientation correlates with the aspect ratio.
“As body orientation correlates with the aspect ratio we assume that the bounding box regression task and hereby the detection performance could also benefit from learning all three tasks jointly in one network.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.
“there are already several vision-based person detection systems on-board production vehicles on the market.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.
“active safety systems for pedestrians and cyclists involve additional sensors for detecting obstacles in front of the vehicle: a second camera (stereo vision), radar or LiDAR.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current commercial systems are in the context of driver assistance, meaning that a correct detection performance of about 90% is acceptable, as long as the false alarm rate is essentially zero.
“It should be finally noted that current commercial systems are in the context of driver assistance, meaning that a correct detection performance of about 90% is acceptable, as long as the false alarm rate is essentially zero.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.
“Recent detection methods like R-FCN or Faster R-CNN have profited from incorporating the proposal generation in an end-to-end learning strategy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.
“In general, there is no loss enforcing a one to one matching between detections and ground-truth samples.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The task of suppressing multiple detections for the same object is usually solved by the decoupled non-maximum suppression.
“The task of suppressing multiple detections for the same object is usually solved by the decoupled non-maximum suppression.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Motion prediction based on point kinematics is often not accurate because of abrupt changes in person motion.
“Motion prediction based on point kinematics is often not accurate because of abrupt changes in person motion.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In this study, all errors are equal in the vehicle application.
“other than we assume in this study, not all errors are equal in the vehicle application.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Semantic segmentation networks for autonomous driving have been successfully trained directly on fisheye images, but due to absence of fisheye datasets, they use artificially warped images of Cityscapes for training and test on fisheye images; artificial images cannot increase the originally captured FOV.
“Semantic segmentation networks for autonomous driving [47] have been successfully trained directly on fisheye images in [12,45].Due to absence of fisheye datasets, they make use of artificially warped images of Cityscapes for training and testing was performed on fisheye images.However, the artificial images cannot increase the originally captured FOV.”
From WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost reviewed datasets provide ground-truth labels for 2D object detection and semantic segmentation tasks.
“Most of the reviewed datasets provide ground-truth labels for 2D object detection and semantic segmentation tasks [60], [75], [88], [90]-[93].”
From Deep Multi-Modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ignoring regions raises LAMR rather than lowering it
MinorThe text says LAMR drops without ignore-region handling, but Table 11 shows it rising from 9.4 to 10.9 for the reasonable scenario and from 22.8 to 24.5 for the small scenario.
“For the reasonable and small test scenario the LAMR drops by about two points.”
“| Baseline | 9.4 | 22.8 | | NoIgnoreHandling | 10.9 | 24.5 |”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812 · see citing works
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803 · see citing works
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562 · see citing works
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460 · see citing works
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 31,590 · see citing works
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105 · see citing works
Labaca-Castro, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40442-0_9 · Cited by 21,100 · see citing works
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.690 · Cited by 19,892 · see citing works
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 19,268 · see citing works
YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.02767 · Cited by 17,141 · see citing works
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248074 · Cited by 14,897 · see citing works
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
Khanam, Z., Achari, V. P. S., Boukhennoufa, I., et al. (2024) · Durham Research Online (Durham University) · doi:10.4230/oasics.ng-res.2024.2 · Cited by 14,048 · see citing works
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433 · see citing works
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Demšar, J. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1248547.1248548 · Cited by 11,966 · see citing works
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2647868.2654889 · Cited by 11,077 · see citing works
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853 · see citing works
The Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective
Everingham, M., Eslami, S. M. A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-014-0733-5 · Cited by 7,139 · see citing works
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061 · see citing works
Selective Search for Object Recognition
Uijlings, J. R. R., van de Sande, K. E. A., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0620-5 · Cited by 5,980 · see citing works
R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Dai, J., Li, Y., He, K., & Sun, J. Z. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06409 · Cited by 5,135 · see citing works
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature EmbeddingPreprint
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.5093 · Cited by 4,749 · see citing works
CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition
Razavian, A. S., Azizpour, H., Sullivan, J., & Carlsson, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2014.131 · Cited by 4,451 · see citing works
Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art
Dollár, P., Wojek, C., Schiele, B., & Perona, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.155 · Cited by 3,191 · see citing works
Speed/Accuracy Trade-Offs for Modern Convolutional Object Detectors
Huang, J., Rathod, V., Sun, C., Zhu, M., Korattikara, A., Fathi, A., Fischer, I., Wojna, Z., Song, Y., Guadarrama, S., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.351 · Cited by 2,743 · see citing works
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W. F., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5206848 · Cited by 2,714 · see citing works
Training Region-Based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Mining
Shrivastava, A., Gupta, A., & Girshick, R. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.89 · Cited by 2,686 · see citing works
OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networks
Sermanet, P., Eigen, D., Zhang, X., Mathieu, M., Fergus, R., & LeCun, Y. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6229 · Cited by 2,680 · see citing works
Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era
Sun, C., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., & Gupta, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.97 · Cited by 2,484 · see citing works
Torralba, A., & Efros, A. A. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995347 · Cited by 2,440 · see citing works
Soft-NMS — Improving Object Detection with One Line of Code
Bodla, N., Singh, B., Chellappa, R., & Davis, L. S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.593 · Cited by 2,274 · cited 8× · see citing works
“In [78] a neural network is trained to rescore detections, which renders a further NMS stage unnecessary.”
BackgroundInfluentialFast Feature Pyramids for Object Detection
Dollár, P., Appel, R., Belongie, S., & Perona, P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2300479 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
A Unified Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Object Detection
Cai, Z., Fan, Q., Feris, R. S., & Vasconcelos, N. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_22 · Cited by 1,605 · see citing works
Multispectral pedestrian detection: Benchmark dataset and baseline
Hwang, S., Park, J., Kim, N., Choi, Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298706 · Cited by 1,249 · see citing works
Dollar, P., Tu, Z., Perona, P., & Belongie, S. (2009) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2009 · doi:10.5244/c.23.91 · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments
Enzweiler, M., & Gavrila, D. M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.260 · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiscale Combinatorial Grouping
Arbelaez, P., Pont-Tuset, J., Barron, J., Marques, F., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.49 · Cited by 1,155 · see citing works
CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detection
Zhang, S., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.474 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
BING: Binarized Normed Gradients for Objectness Estimation at 300fps
Cheng, M., Zhang, Z., Lin, W.-Y., & Torr, P. H. S. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.414 · Cited by 1,042 · see citing works
Perceptual Generative Adversarial Networks for Small Object Detection
Li, J., Liang, X., Wei, Y., Xu, T., Feng, J., & Yan, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.211 · Cited by 953 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For Faster R-CNN, R-FCN and SSD we use VGG-16 [45] as base network as it is very common in pedestrian detection [4], [60], [62], [63], [71].”
MethodIs Faster R-CNN Doing Well for Pedestrian Detection?
Zhang, L., Lin, L., Liang, X., & He, K. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_28 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Scale-aware Fast R-CNN for Pedestrian Detection
Li, J., Liang, X., Shen, S., Xu, T., Feng, J., & Yan, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2759508 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Learning Non-maximum Suppression
Hosang, J., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.685 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals?
Hosang, J., Benenson, R., Dollar, P., & Schiele, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2465908 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Render for CNN: Viewpoint Estimation in Images Using CNNs Trained with Rendered 3D Model Views
Su, H., Qi, C. R., Li, Y., & Guibas, L. J. (2015) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.308 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
(2015) · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Yang, F., Choi, W., & Lin, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.234 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Ten Years of Pedestrian Detection, What Have We Learned?
Benenson, R., Omran, M., Hosang, J., & Schiele, B. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16181-5_47 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?Preprint
Huh, M., Agrawal, P., & Efros, A. A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.08614 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification
Munder, S., & Gavrila, D. M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.217 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Self-citationDepth and Appearance for Mobile Scene Analysis
Ess, A., Leibe, B., & Van Gool, L. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4409092 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
How Far are We from Solving Pedestrian Detection?
Zhang, S., Benenson, R., Omran, M., Hosang, J., & Schiele, B. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.141 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Filtered channel features for pedestrian detection
Zhang, S., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298784 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Multi-cue onboard pedestrian detection
Wojek, C., Walk, S., & Schiele, B. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206638 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Tulsiani, S., & Malik, J. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298758 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Describing people: A poselet-based approach to attribute classification
Bourdev, L. D., Maji, S., & Malik, J. (2011) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126413 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Taking a deeper look at pedestrians
Hosang, J., Omran, M., Benenson, R., & Schiele, B. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299034 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
What Can Help Pedestrian Detection?
Mao, J., Xiao, T., Jiang, Y., & Cao, Z. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.639 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Accurate Single Stage Detector Using Recurrent Rolling Convolution
Ren, J., Chen, X., Liu, J., Sun, W., Pang, J., Yan, Q., Tai, Y.-W., & Xu, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.87 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Subcategory-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Object Proposals and Detection
Yu, X., Choi, W., Lin, Y., & Savarese, S. (2017) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv.2017.108 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Informed Haar-Like Features Improve Pedestrian Detection
Zhang, S., Bauckhage, C., & Cremers, A. B. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.126 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Context-Based Pedestrian Path Prediction
Kooij, J. F. P., Schneider, N., Flohr, F. B., & Gavrila, D. M. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_40 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationSeeking the Strongest Rigid Detector
Benenson, R., Mathias, M., Tuytelaars, T., & Gool, L. V. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.470 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Towards Reaching Human Performance in Pedestrian Detection
Zhang, S., Benenson, R., Omran, M., Hosang, J., & Schiele, B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2700460 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Person Attribute Recognition with a Jointly-Trained Holistic CNN Model
Sudowe, P., Spitzer, H., & Leibe, B. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2015.51 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Robust Multi-resolution Pedestrian Detection in Traffic Scenes
Yan, J., Zhang, X., Lei, Z., Liao, S., & Li, S. Z. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.390 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Single-Pedestrian Detection Aided by Multi-pedestrian Detection
Ouyang, W., & Wang, X. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.411 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Scale-aware Fast R-CNN for Pedestrian DetectionPreprint
Li, J., Liang, X., Shen, S., et al. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1510.08160 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A new pedestrian dataset for supervised learning
Overett, G., Petersson, L., Brewer, N., Andersson, L. A. A., & Pettersson, N. (2008) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2008.4621297 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Pose-RCNN: Joint object detection and pose estimation using 3D object proposals
Braun, M., Rao, Q., Wang, Y., et al. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795763 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationAdaptive Image Sampling and Windows Classification for On-board Pedestrian Detection
Gerónimo, D., Sappa, A. D., López, A. M., et al. (2019) · PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) · doi:10.2390/biecoll-icvs2007-81 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Learning discriminative spatial representation for image classification
Sharma, G., & Jurie, F. (2011) · British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) · doi:10.5244/c.25.6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Biternion Nets: Continuous Head Pose Regression from Discrete Training Labels
Beyer, L., Hermans, A., & Leibe, B. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24947-6_13 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Expecting the Unexpected: Training Detectors for Unusual Pedestrians with Adversarial Imposters
Huang, S., & Ramanan, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.496 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Multi-cue onboard pedestrian detection
Wojek, C., Walk, S., & Schiele, B. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5206638 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Fine-grained classification of pedestrians in video: Benchmark and state of the art
Hall, D., & Perona, P. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299187 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Scale-Adaptive Deconvolutional Regression Network for Pedestrian Detection
Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, C., Guo, H., & Lu, H. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54184-6_26 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
An Exploration of Why and When Pedestrian Detection Fails
Rajaram, R. N., Ohn-Bar, E., & Trivedi, M. M. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2015.377 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- li, 2016, A new benchmark for vison-based cyclist detection, Proc IEEE Intell Veh Symp, 1028
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feng, D., Haase-Schutz, C., Rosenbaum, L., Hertlein, H., Glaser, C., Timm, F., Wiesbeck, W., & Dietmayer, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2972974 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Yogamani, S., Hughes, C., Horgan, J., Sistu, G., Chennupati, S., Uricar, M., Milz, S., Simon, M., Amende, K., Witt, C., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00940 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
“In the recent EuroCity persons dataset [5], the authors argued that any anonymization measure will introduce a bias.”
BackgroundTahir, N. U. A., Zhang, Z., Asim, M., Chen, J., & ELAffendi, M. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17030103 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
SP-NAS: Serial-to-Parallel Backbone Search for Object Detection
Jiang, C., Xu, H., Zhang, W., Liang, X., & Li, Z. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01188 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Braun, M., Krebs, S., Flohr, F., & Gavrila, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Daimler (Germany) (DE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2019-08-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1844-1861
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W2803740064
- Semantic Scholar
- 5d2f340beac2389a6f0ac27672faf60fd86e3c2a
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 19.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- human detection, traffic scenes, pedestrian detection, cyclist detection, object detection benchmark, data diversity, annotation quality, training data size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review