The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-local Color Image Denoising with Convolutional Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel deep network architecture for grayscale and color image denoising that is based on a non-local image model. Our motivation for the overall design of the proposed network stems from variational methods that exploit the inherent non-local self-similarity property of natural images. We build on this concept and introduce deep networks that perform non-local processing and at the same time they significantly benefit from discriminative learning. Experiments on the Berkeley segmentation dataset, comparing several state-of-the-art methods, show that the proposed non-local models achieve the best reported denoising performance both for grayscale and color images for all the tested noise levels. It is also worth noting that this increase in performance comes at no extra cost on the capacity of the network compared to existing alternative deep network architectures. In addition, we highlight a direct link of the proposed non-local models to convolutional neural networks. This connection is of significant importance since it allows our models to take full advantage of the latest advances on GPU computing in deep learning and makes them amenable to efficient implementations through their inherent parallelism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901238 · Cited by 9,283
Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., & Malik, J. (2002) · Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001 · doi:10.1109/iccv.2001.937655 · Cited by 8,216
Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networks
Kim, J., Lee, J. K., & Lee, K. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.182 · Cited by 7,870
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
MatConvNet: Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB
Vedaldi, A., & Lenc, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2733373.2807412 · Cited by 2,444
Computational Methods for Inverse Problems
Vogel, C. R. (2002) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898717570 · Cited by 2,370
Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising
Gu, S., Zhang, L., Zuo, W., & Feng, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.366 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 3×
“) BM3D [7] LSSC [25] EPLL [41] WNNM [15] CSF(5)7×7 [34] TNRD(5)7×7 [6] DGCRF8 [37] MLP [5] NLNet(5)5×5 NLNet(5)7×7 15 31.”
MethodIntroduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging
Bertero, M., & Boccacci, P. (1998) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1887/0750304359 · Cited by 1,899
Non-local sparse models for image restoration
Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G., & Zisserman, A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459452 · Cited by 1,666
Bredies, K., Kunisch, K., & Pock, T. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/090769521 · Cited by 1,535
From learning models of natural image patches to whole image restoration
Zoran, D., & Weiss, Y. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126278 · Cited by 1,522
Nonlocal Operators with Applications to Image Processing
Gilboa, G., & Osher, S. (2009) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/070698592 · Cited by 1,423
Chen, Y., & Pock, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2596743 · Cited by 1,344
Image denoising: Can plain neural networks compete with BM3D?
Burger, H. C., Schuler, C. J., & Harmeling, S. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247952 · Cited by 1,325
Scalable Object Detection Using Deep Neural Networks
Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Toshev, A., & Anguelov, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.276 · Cited by 1,161 · cited 1×
“Deep learning methods have been successfully applied in various computer vision tasks, including image classification [16,20] and object detection [11,29], and have dramatically improved the performance of these systems, setting the new state-of-the-art.”
BackgroundRoth, S., & Black, M. J. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-008-0197-6 · Cited by 847
Analysis versus synthesis in signal priors
Elad, M., Milanfar, P., & Rubinstein, R. (2007) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/23/3/007 · Cited by 698
BM3D Frames and Variational Image Deblurring
Danielyan, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2176954 · Cited by 611
Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration
Figueiredo, M. A. T., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Nowak, R. D. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909318 · Cited by 548
Shrinkage Fields for Effective Image Restoration
Schmidt, U., & Roth, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.349 · Cited by 543
Nonlocal Discrete Regularization on Weighted Graphs: A Framework for Image and Manifold Processing
Elmoataz, A., Lezoray, O., & Bougleux, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2008.924284 · Cited by 466
Image Denoising Methods. A New Nonlocal Principle
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J. M. (2010) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/090773908 · Cited by 442
1 BM3D frames and variational image deblurring
Danielyan, A., Katkovnik, V., Egiazarian, K., & Member, S. (2012) · Cited by 414
Deblurring and Denoising of Images by Nonlocal Functionals
Kindermann, S., Osher, S., & Jones, P. W. (2005) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/050622249 · Cited by 369
Bailer, C., Taetz, B., & Stricker, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.457 · Cited by 233
Hessian-Based Norm Regularization for Image Restoration With Biomedical Applications
Lefkimmiatis, S., Bourquard, A., & Unser, M. A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2168232 · Cited by 225
Self-citationDecomposition of images by the anisotropic Rudin‐Osher‐Fatemi model
Esedoḡlu, S., & Osher, S. J. (2004) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20045 · Cited by 223
Signal restoration with overcomplete wavelet transforms: comparison of analysis and synthesis priors
Selesnick, I. W., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2009) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.826663 · Cited by 175
Hessian Schatten-Norm Regularization for Linear Inverse Problems
Lefkimmiatis, S., Ward, J. P., & Unser, M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2237919 · Cited by 172
Self-citationRegularization on Discrete Spaces
Zhou, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11550518_45 · Cited by 151
Structure Tensor Total Variation
Lefkimmiatis, S., Roussos, A., Maragos, P. A., & Unser, M. A. (2015) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/14098154x · Cited by 132
Self-citationVemulapalli, R., Tuzel, O., & Liu, M.-Y. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.519 · Cited by 74
Nonlocal Structure Tensor Functionals for Image Regularization
Lefkimmiatis, S., & Osher, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2015.2434616 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Cited by
Wang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00813 · Cited by 11,596
FFDNet: Toward a Fast and Flexible Solution for CNN-Based Image Denoising
Zhang, K., Zuo, W., & Zhang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2839891 · Cited by 2,678
Pre-Trained Image Processing Transformer
Chen, H., Wang, Y., Guo, T., Xu, C., Deng, Y., Liu, Z., Ma, S., Xu, C., Xu, C., & Gao, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01212 · Cited by 2,308
Lempitsky, V., Vedaldi, A., & Ulyanov, D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00984 · Cited by 1,916
Deep Learning on Image Denoising: An overview
Tian, C., Fei, L., Zheng, W., Xu, Y., Zuo, W., & Lin, C.-W. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · Cited by 1,091
Metadata
- Authors
- Lefkimmiatis, S.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 5882-5891
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2550616896
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
