The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration
Abstract
Standard formulations of image/signal deconvolution under wavelet-based priors/regularizers lead to very high-dimensional optimization problems involving the following difficulties: the non-Gaussian (heavy-tailed) wavelet priors lead to objective functions which are nonquadratic, usually nondifferentiable, and sometimes even nonconvex; the presence of the convolution operator destroys the separability which underlies the simplicity of wavelet-based denoising. This paper presents a unified view of several recently proposed algorithms for handling this class of optimization problems, placing them in a common majorization-minimization (MM) framework. One of the classes of algorithms considered (when using quadratic bounds on nondifferentiable log-priors) shares the infamous "singularity issue" (SI) of "iteratively reweighted least squares" (IRLS) algorithms: the possibility of having to handle infinite weights, which may cause both numerical and convergence issues. In this paper, we prove several new results which strongly support the claim that the SI does not compromise the usefulness of this class of algorithms. Exploiting the unified MM perspective, we introduce a new algorithm, resulting from using l1 bounds for nonconvex regularizers; the experiments confirm the superior performance of this method, when compared to the one based on quadratic majorization. Finally, an experimental comparison of the several algorithms, reveals their relative merits for different standard types of scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing
(1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-466606-1.x5000-4 · Cited by 16,227
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827596304010 · Cited by 6,845
An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint.
Daubechies, I., Defrise, M., & De Mol, C. (2004) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20042 · Cited by 4,958
On the Convergence Properties of the EM Algorithm
Wu, C. F. J. (1983) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346060 · Cited by 3,269
Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting
Combettes, P. L., & Wajs, V. R. (2005) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/050626090 · Cited by 2,678
Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms I
Hiriart-Urruty, J.-B., & Lemaréchal, C. (1993) · Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02796-7 · Cited by 2,378
Cited by
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909319 · Cited by 2,064
Self-citationMajorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Fast Image Recovery Using Variable Splitting and Constrained Optimization
Afonso, M. V., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2047910 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Figueiredo, M. A. T., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Nowak, R. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2980-2991
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1975377467
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 27.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2007.909318
- The paper
- Figueiredo, M. A. T., Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Nowak, R. D. (2007). Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2007.909318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.