Cited by 159Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVideo Analysis and SummarizationHuman Pose and Action Recognition

M3: Multimodal Memory Modelling for Video Captioning

Wang, Junbo, Wang, Wei, Huang, Yan, Wang, Liang, Tan, Tieniu·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Video captioning which automatically translates video clips into natural language sentences is a very important task in computer vision. By virtue of recent deep learning technologies, video captioning has made great progress. However, learning an effective mapping from the visual sequence space to the language space is still a challenging problem due to the long-term multimodal dependency modelling and semantic misalignment. Inspired by the facts that memory modelling poses potential advantages to long-term sequential problems [35] and working memory is the key factor of visual attention [33], we propose a Multimodal Memory Model (M3) to describe videos, which builds a visual and textual shared memory to model the long-term visual-textual dependency and further guide visual attention on described visual targets to solve visual-textual alignments. Specifically, similar to [10], the proposed M3 attaches an external memory to store and retrieve both visual and textual contents by interacting with video and sentence with multiple read and write operations. To evaluate the proposed model, we perform experiments on two public datasets: MSVD and MSR-VTT. The experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms most of the state-of-the-art methods in terms of BLEU and METEOR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00784

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M3's method allowed multiple read and write operations, facilitating rich interactions between video sequences and corresponding sentences.

    “This method allowed for multiple read and write operations, facilitating rich interactions between video sequences and corresponding sentences.”

    From The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory? (2026) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, L., & Tan, T.
Affiliations
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
7512-7520
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2554906389
Cited by
159
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
video captioning, external memory, visual-textual alignment, visual attention, shared memory, working memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review