PreprintCited by 528Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks

Open access
Bordes, Antoine, Usunier, Nicolas, Chopra, Sumit, Weston, Jason·2015·arXiv

Abstract

Training large-scale question answering systems is complicated because training sources usually cover a small portion of the range of possible questions. This paper studies the impact of multitask and transfer learning for simple question answering; a setting for which the reasoning required to answer is quite easy, as long as one can retrieve the correct evidence given a question, which can be difficult in large-scale conditions. To this end, we introduce a new dataset of 100k questions that we use in conjunction with existing benchmarks. We conduct our study within the framework of Memory Networks (Weston et al., 2015) because this perspective allows us to eventually scale up to more complex reasoning, and show that Memory Networks can be successfully trained to achieve excellent performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In SimpleQuestions, some questions have corresponding single relations in Freebase but need to be expressed using multiple relations in DBpedia.

    “In SimpleQuestions (Bordes et al., 2015), some questions have corresponding single relations in Freebase but need to be expressed using multiple relations in DBpedia.”

    From Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2022) · cites this paper as Bordes et al., 2015

    Section 2.2 (p. 3) says each SimpleQuestions question is paired with a Freebase fact, and Section 2 (p. 2) describes answering such questions through a single relationship. The paper does not address whether those questions require multiple relations in DBpedia. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W580074167
Cited by
528
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
memory networks, multi-task learning, transfer learning, evidence retrieval, question answering dataset, question answering benchmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review