Cited by 1,258Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruning

Open access
Mallya, Arun, Lazebnik, Svetlana·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

This paper presents a method for adding multiple tasks to a single deep neural network while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. Inspired by network pruning techniques, we exploit redundancies in large deep networks to free up parameters that can then be employed to learn new tasks. By performing iterative pruning and network re-training, we are able to sequentially "pack" multiple tasks into a single network while ensuring minimal drop in performance and minimal storage overhead. Unlike prior work that uses proxy losses to maintain accuracy on older tasks, we always optimize for the task at hand. We perform extensive experiments on a variety of network architectures and large-scale datasets, and observe much better robustness against catastrophic forgetting than prior work. In particular, we are able to add three fine-grained classification tasks to a single ImageNet-trained VGG-16 network and achieve accuracies close to those of separately trained networks for each task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00810

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. R. Aljundi, P. Chakravarty, and T. Tuytelaars. Expert Gate: Lifelong learning with a network of experts. In CVPR, 2017. 1
  2. C. Fernando, D. Banarse, C. Blundell, Y. Zwols, D. Ha, A. A. Rusu, A. Pritzel, and D. Wierstra. PathNet: Evo- lution channels gradient descent in super neural networks. arXiv:1701.08734, 2017. 2, 3 · arXiv
  3. R. M. French. Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist net- works. Trends in cognitive sciences, 3(4):128-135, 1999.
  4. S. Gupta, A. Agrawal, K. Gopalakrishnan, and P. Narayanan. Deep learning with limited numerical precision. In ICML, 2015. 2
  5. S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally. Deep compression: Com- pressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quanti- zation and huffman coding. In ICLR, 2016. 2
  6. S. Han, J. Pool, S. Narang, H. Mao, E. Gong, S. Tang, E. Elsen, P. Vajda, M. Paluri, J. Tran, et al. DSD: Dense- sparse-dense training for deep neural networks. In ICLR, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 7
  7. S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, and W. Dally. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network. In NIPS, 2015. 1, 2, 3, 7
  8. G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. In NIPS Workshop, 2014. 2
  9. G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. van der Maaten, and K. Q. Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. In CVPR, 2017. 1, 3, 5
  10. I. Hubara, M. Courbariaux, D. Soudry, R. El-Yaniv, and Y. Bengio. Binarized neural networks. In NIPS, 2016. 2, 8
  11. S.-W. Lee, J.-H. Kim, J.-W. Ha, and B.-T. Zhang. Overcom- ing catastrophic forgetting by incremental moment match- ing. In NIPS, 2017. 2, 3
  12. H. Li, A. Kadav, I. Durdanovic, H. Samet, and H. P. Graf. Pruning filters for efficient convnets. In ICLR, 2017. 1, 2, 8
  13. Z. Li and D. Hoiem. Learning without forgetting. In ECCV, 2016. 1, 2, 3, 4
  14. Z. Liu, J. Li, Z. Shen, G. Huang, S. Yan, and C. Zhang. Learning efficient convolutional networks through network slimming. In ICCV, 2017. 1, 2, 8
  15. P. Molchanov, S. Tyree, T. Karras, T. Aila, and J. Kautz. Pruning convolutional neural networks for resource efficient inference. In ICLR, 2017. 1, 2, 8
  16. M. Rastegari, V. Ordonez, J. Redmon, and A. Farhadi. Xnor- net: Imagenet classification using binary convolutional neu- ral networks. In ECCV, 2016. 2, 8
  17. A. A. Rusu, N. C. Rabinowitz, G. Desjardins, H. Soyer, J. Kirkpatrick, K. Kavukcuoglu, R. Pascanu, and R. Hadsell. Progressive neural networks. arXiv:1606.04671, 2016. 2, 3 · arXiv
  18. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolu- tional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR, abs/1409.1556, 2014. 1, 3 · arXiv
  19. B. Zhou, A. Lapedriza, A. Khosla, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. Places: A 10 million image database for scene recognition. TPAMI, 2017. 1, 3, 4, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallya, A., & Lazebnik, S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
7765-7773
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770882886
Cited by
1,258
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 235 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 20
FWCI
30.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1718221, 1563727)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
catastrophic forgetting, iterative pruning, multi-task learning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, network redundancy, parameter reuse, storage efficiency, fine-grained classification, VGG16, continual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review