Cited by 599Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMedical Imaging and Analysis

An Unsupervised Learning Model for Deformable Medical Image Registration

Open access
Balakrishnan, Guha, Zhao, Amy, Sabuncu, Mert R., Dalca, Adrian V., Guttag, John·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

We present a fast learning-based algorithm for deformable, pairwise 3D medical image registration. Current registration methods optimize an objective function independently for each pair of images, which can be time-consuming for large data. We define registration as a parametric function, and optimize its parameters given a set of images from a collection of interest. Given a new pair of scans, we can quickly compute a registration field by directly evaluating the function using the learned parameters. We model this function using a CNN, and use a spatial transform layer to reconstruct one image from another while imposing smoothness constraints on the registration field. The proposed method does not require supervised information such as ground truth registration fields or anatomical landmarks. We demonstrate registration accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art 3D image registration, while operating orders of magnitude faster in practice. Our method promises to significantly speed up medical image analysis and processing pipelines, while facilitating novel directions in learning-based registration and its applications. Our code is available at https://github.com/balakg/voxelmorph.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00964

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DiffPose develops a sparse multiscale variant of local normalized cross correlation that is robust to local minima and faster to evaluate.

    “we develop a sparse multiscale variant of local normalized cross correlation [6, 7] that is robust to local minima and faster to evaluate.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M. R., Dalca, A. V., & Guttag, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
9252-9260
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787740020
Cited by
599
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 7
FWCI
16.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
deformable image registration, 3D medical image registration, unsupervised learning, convolutional neural networks, pairwise registration, learning-based registration, VoxelMorph

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review