The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation
Abstract
Progress on object detection is enabled by datasets that focus the research community’s attention on open challenges. This process led us from simple images to complex scenes and from bounding boxes to segmentation masks. In this work, we introduce LVIS (pronounced ‘el-vis’): a new dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentation. We plan to collect 2.2 million high-quality instance segmentation masks for over 1000 entry-level object categories in 164k images. Due to the Zipfian distribution of categories in natural images, LVIS naturally has a long tail of categories with few training samples. Given that state-of-the-art deep learning methods for object detection perform poorly in the low-sample regime, we believe that our dataset poses an important and exciting new scientific challenge. LVIS is available at http://www.lvisdataset.org.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We build our benchmark on the LVIS dataset (Gupta et al., 2019), known for its rich long-tail vocabulary and abundance of small, densely packed objects.”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Gupta et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“LVIS. We construct our benchmark for open-world small and dense object grounding based on the LVIS (Gupta et al., 2019) dataset, which offers the richest long-tail object vocabulary and the highest prevalence of small and densely packed instances among existing segmentation datasets.”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Gupta et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
Self-citationBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Kilgarriff, A. (2000) · Language · doi:10.2307/417141 · Cited by 11,529
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- liberman, 2015, Reproducible research and the common task method, Simmons Foundation Lecture
- miller, 1998, WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
Self-citationKirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A. C., Lo, W.-Y., et al. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371 · Cited by 11,953
“ADE20K[117] BBBC038v1[12] Cityscapes[25] DOORS[80] DRAM[24] EgoHOS[113] GTEA[34,63] Hypersim[86] IBD[17] iShape[111] LVIS[44] NDD20[100] NDISPark[22,23] OVIS[81] PPDLS[74] Plittersdorf[46] STREETS[91] TimberSeg[38] TrashCan[52] VISOR[28,27] WoodScape[112] PIDRay[104] ZeroWaste-f[6] Figure 8: Samples from the 23 divers…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationScalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset
Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., Caine, B., et al. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00252 · Cited by 3,437
Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-training for Open-Set Object Detection
Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Ren, T., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Jiang, Q., Li, C., Yang, J., Su, H., et al. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72970-6_3 · Cited by 2,074
Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentation
Ghiasi, G., Cui, Y., Srinivas, A., Qian, R., Lin, T.-Y., Cubuk, E. D., Le, Q. V., & Zoph, B. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00294 · Cited by 1,324
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, A., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- FAIR
- ORCID
- Gupta, Agrim
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-06
- Pages
- 5351-5359
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948672349
- Cited by
- 1,274
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 246 · 2024: 285 · 2023: 219 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 11
- FWCI
- 30.32
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- lymphovascular invasion, instance segmentation masks, object categories, object detection, benchmark dataset, complex scenes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
