The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting Local Descriptor Based Image-To-Class Measure for Few-Shot Learning
Open accessAbstract
Few-shot learning in image classification aims to learn a classifier to classify images when only few training examples are available for each class. Recent work has achieved promising classification performance, where an image-level feature based measure is usually used. In this paper, we argue that a measure at such a level may not be effective enough in light of the scarcity of examples in few-shot learning. Instead, we think a local descriptor based image-to-class measure should be taken, inspired by its surprising success in the heydays of local invariant features. Specifically, building upon the recent episodic training mechanism, we propose a Deep Nearest Neighbor Neural Network (DN4 in short) and train it in an end-to-end manner. Its key difference from the literature is the replacement of the image-level feature based measure in the final layer by a local descriptor based image-to-class measure. This measure is conducted online via a k-nearest neighbor search over the deep local descriptors of convolutional feature maps. The proposed DN4 not only learns the optimal deep local descriptors for the image-to-class measure, but also utilizes the higher efficiency of such a measure in the case of example scarcity, thanks to the exchangeability of visual patterns across the images in the same class. Our work leads to a simple, effective, and computationally efficient framework for few-shot learning. Experimental study on benchmark datasets consistently shows its superiority over the related state-of-the-art, with the largest absolute improvement of 17% over the next best. The source code can be available from https://github.com/WenbinLee/DN4.git.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Few-Shot Visual Learning Without Forgetting
Gidaris, S., & Komodakis, N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00459 · Cited by 1,128
Learning to Learn: Introduction and Overview
Thrun, S., & Pratt, L. (1998) · Learning to Learn · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5529-2_1 · Cited by 521
Cited by
A Comprehensive Survey of Few-shot Learning: Evolution, Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities
Song, Y., Wang, T., Cai, P., Mondal, S. K., & Sahoo, J. P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3582688 · Cited by 721
Deep metric learning for few-shot image classification: A Review of recent developments
Li, X., Yang, X., Ma, Z., & Xue, J.-H. (2023) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109381 · Cited by 243
Uncertainty-Guided Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning With Knowledge Distillation
Cui, Y., Deng, W., Xu, X., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Pietikäinen, M., & Liu, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2022.3208743 · Cited by 44
Generalized zero and few-shot transfer for facial forgery detection
Aneja, S., & Nießner, M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11863 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Wang, L., Xu, J., Huo, J., Gao, Y., & Luo, J.
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-06
- Pages
- 7253-7260
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979689312
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting Local Descriptor Based Image-To-Class Measure for Few-Shot Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2019.00743
- The paper
- Li, W., Wang, L., Xu, J., Huo, J., Gao, Y., & Luo, J. (2019). Revisiting Local Descriptor Based Image-To-Class Measure for Few-Shot Learning. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2019.00743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.