Uncertainty-Guided Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning With Knowledge Distillation
Abstract
Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) aims at incrementally learning novel classes without forgetting old ones. This capability becomes more challenging when novel tasks contain one or a few labeled training samples, which leads to a more practical learning scenario,i.e., Few-Shot Class- Incremental Learning (FSCIL). The dilemma on FSCIL lies in serious overfitting and exacerbated catastrophic forgetting caused by the limited training data from novel classes. In this paper, excited by the easy accessibility of unlabeled data, we conduct a pioneering work and focus on a Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (Semi-FSCIL) problem, which requires the model incrementally to learn new classes from extremely limited labeled samples and a large number of unlabeled samples. To address this problem, a simple but efficient framework is first constructed based on the knowledge distillation technique to alleviate catastrophic forgetting. To efficiently mitigate the overfitting problem on novel categories with unlabeled data, uncertainty-guided semi-supervised learning is incorporated into this framework to select unlabeled samples into incremental learning sessions considering the model uncertainty. This process provides extra reliable supervision for the distillation process and contributes to better formulating the class means. Our extensive experiments on CIFAR100, miniImageNet and CUB200 datasets demonstrate the promising performance of our proposed method, and define baselin…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies use knowledge distillation to maintain competent classification capabilities on previous classes while learning new ones.
“To mitigate catastrophic forgetting, some studies [44, 45, 46] use KD to maintain competent classification capabilities on previous classes while learning new ones.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Cui et al. [45] introduced the Us-KD framework, which used an uncertainty-guided module to select unlabeled data to mitigate overfitting during knowledge transfer.
“Cui et al. [45] introduced the Us-KD framework, which used an uncertainty-guided module to select unlabeled data to mitigate overfitting during knowledge transfer.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 21,793 · see citing works
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114 · Cited by 7,899 · see citing works
ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., & Zafeiriou, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00482 · Cited by 7,781 · see citing works
iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning
Rebuffi, S.-A., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., & Lampert, C. H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.587 · Cited by 3,988 · see citing works
Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem
McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60536-8 · Cited by 3,770 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small
Elman, J. L. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90058-4 · Cited by 1,988 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is the biological inspiration for this learning paradigm [17], as human learning is knowledge-driven and we maintain knowledge learned from all previous tasks, apply them to help us solve new tasks with one or several examples (few-shot learning ability) [18], [19], [20] without forgetting…”
BackgroundMemory Aware Synapses: Learning What (not) to Forget
Aljundi, R., Babiloni, F., Elhoseiny, M., Rohrbach, M., & Tuytelaars, T. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01219-9_9 · Cited by 1,590 · see citing works
Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C., & Botvinick, M. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.011 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Silvén, O., Pietikäinen, M., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3529038 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“To mitigate catastrophic forgetting, some studies [44], [45], [46] use KD to maintain competent classification capabilities on previous classes while learning new ones.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Cui, Y., Deng, W., Xu, X., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Pietikäinen, M., & Liu, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 6422-6435
- ISSN
- 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0077
- OpenAlex
- W4296916378
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3100800)
- Academy of Finland (331883)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872379, 62022091)
- China Scholarship Council (201903170129)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- class-incremental learning, few-shot learning, semi-supervised learning, catastrophic forgetting, knowledge distillation, unlabeled data, overfitting, sample selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review