Cited by 478Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Deep Supervised Cross-Modal Retrieval

Zhen, Liangli, Hu, Peng, Wang, Xu, Peng, Dezhong·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Cross-modal retrieval aims to enable flexible retrieval across different modalities. The core of cross-modal retrieval is how to measure the content similarity between different types of data. In this paper, we present a novel cross-modal retrieval method, called Deep Supervised Cross-modal Retrieval (DSCMR). It aims to find a common representation space, in which the samples from different modalities can be compared directly. Specifically, DSCMR minimises the discrimination loss in both the label space and the common representation space to supervise the model learning discriminative features. Furthermore, it simultaneously minimises the modality invariance loss and uses a weight sharing strategy to eliminate the cross-modal discrepancy of multimedia data in the common representation space to learn modality-invariant features. Comprehensive experimental results on four widely-used benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method is effective in cross-modal learning and significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art cross-modal retrieval methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.01064

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MULTIBENCH currently does not include several important research areas outside of multimodal fusion, such as question answering, retrieval, grounding, and reinforcement learning.

    “While MULTIBENCH currently does not include several important research areas outside of multimodal fusion (e.g., question answering [4, 63], retrieval [187], grounding [32], and reinforcement learning [110]), and is also limited by the models and metrics it supports, we outline our plan to expand in these directions in Appendix I.”
  • There has been extensive research in defining objective functions to tackle the challenge of multimodal alignment: capturing a representation space where semantically similar concepts from different modalities are close together.

    “There has been extensive research in defining objective functions to tackle the challenge of multimodal alignment: capturing a representation space where semantically similar concepts from different modalities are close together.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhen, L., Hu, P., Wang, X., & Peng, D.
Affiliations
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
10386-10395
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967957126
Cited by
478
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 7
FWCI
17.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
cross-modal retrieval, modality invariance, parameter sharing, discriminative features, multimedia data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review