Cited by 14Gaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Scalable Uncertainty for Computer Vision With Functional Variational Inference

Open access
Carvalho, Eduardo D. C., Clark, Ronald, Nicastro, Andrea, Kelly, Paul H. J.·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

As Deep Learning continues to yield successful applications in Computer Vision, the ability to quantify all forms of uncertainty is a paramount requirement for its safe and reliable deployment in the real-world. In this work, we leverage the formulation of variational inference in function space, where we associate Gaussian Processes (GPs) to both Bayesian CNN priors and variational family. Since GPs are fully determined by their mean and covariance functions, we are able to obtain predictive uncertainty estimates at the cost of a single forward pass through any chosen CNN architecture and for any supervised learning task. By leveraging the structure of the induced covariance matrices, we propose numerically efficient algorithms which enable fast training in the context of high-dimensional tasks such as depth estimation and semantic segmentation. Additionally, we provide sufficient conditions for constructing regression loss functions whose probabilistic counterparts are compatible with aleatoric uncertainty quantification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01202

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2017, Jungo et al. [659] used CNN with MC dropout for segmentation of brain tumor on 1 dataset.

    “Jungo al. [659] | et | 2017 | CNN | Segmentation | Brain tumor | 1 | MC dropout”

    From A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [659]

    Section 6.1, Semantic Segmentation (page unavailable), says this paper studies segmentation on the CamVid dataset and compares its method with MC dropout. It does not describe the cited work as a 2017 Jungo et al. brain-tum segmentation study; its stated segmentation setting is different. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mohammad Emtiyaz E Khan, Alexander Immer, Ehsan Abedi, and Maciej Korzepa. Approximate in- ference turns deep networks into gaussian processes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, pages 3088-3098, 2019. 6
  2. Jiaxin Shi, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, and Jun Zhu. Scalable training of inference networks for gaussian- process models. In International Conference on Ma- chine Learning, pages 5758-5768, 2019. 2, 3, 6
  3. Ziyu Wang, Tongzheng Ren, Jun Zhu, and Bo Zhang. Function space particle optimization for bayesian neu- ral networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, E. D. C., Clark, R., Nicastro, A., & Kelly, P. H. J.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
12000-12010
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010129597
Cited by
14
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P010040/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
uncertainty quantification, Gaussian processes, Bayesian convolutional neural network, aleatoric uncertainty, depth estimation, semantic segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review