Cited by 140Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsHuman Pose and Action Recognition

Context R-CNN: Long Term Temporal Context for Per-Camera Object Detection

Open access
Beery, Sara, Wu, Guanhang, Rathod, Vivek, Votel, Ronny, Huang, Jonathan·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

In static monitoring cameras, useful contextual information can stretch far beyond the few seconds typical video understanding models might see: subjects may exhibit similar behavior over multiple days, and background objects remain static. Due to power and storage constraints, sampling frequencies are low, often no faster than one frame per second, and sometimes are irregular due to the use of a motion trigger. In order to perform well in this setting, models must be robust to irregular sampling rates. In this paper we propose a method that leverages temporal context from the unlabeled frames of a novel camera to improve performance at that camera. Specifically, we propose an attention-based approach that allows our model, Context R-CNN, to index into a long term memory bank constructed on a per-camera basis and aggregate contextual features from other frames to boost object detection performance on the current frame. We apply Context R-CNN to two settings: (1) species detection using camera traps, and (2) vehicle detection in traffic cameras, showing in both settings that Context R-CNN leads to performance gains over strong baselines. Moreover, we show that increasing the contextual time horizon leads to improved results. When applied to camera trap data from the Snapshot Serengeti dataset, Context R-CNN with context from up to a month of images outperforms a single-frame baseline by 17.9% mAP, and outperforms S3D (a 3d convolution based baseline) by 11.2% mAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01309

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many animals are highly habitual and territorial, leading to very strong correlations between data taken days or even weeks apart from a single sensor.

    “many animals are highly habitual and territorial, leading to very strong correlations between data taken days or even weeks apart from a single sensor52.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

  • Detecting and classifying animal species with DL for population estimates is becoming increasingly popular for images, acoustic spectrograms, and videos.

    “For these reasons, detecting and classifying animal species with DL for the purpose of population estimates is becoming increasingly popular for images52,53, acoustic spectrograms95, and videos96.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 140

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1440-1448, 2015. 3
  2. Kaiming He, Georgia Gkioxari, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Gir- shick. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961-2969, 2017. 4
  3. Xiaoyuan Yu, Jiangping Wang, Roland Kays, Patrick A Jansen, Tianjiang Wang, and Thomas Huang. Auto- mated identification of animal species in camera trap im- ages. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2013(1):52, 2013. 3

Authors
Beery, S., Wu, G., Rathod, V., Votel, R., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
13072-13082
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014313814
Cited by
140
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 7
FWCI
7.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
attention mechanism, memory bank, non-uniform sampling, low frame rate video

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review