Cited by 382Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsData Stream Mining Techniques

Few-Shot Incremental Learning with Continually Evolved Classifiers

Zhang, Chi, Song, Nan, Lin, Guosheng, Zheng, Yun, Pan, Pan, Xu, Yinghui·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) aims to design machine learning algorithms that can continually learn new concepts from a few data points, without forgetting knowledge of old classes. The difficulty lies in that limited data from new classes not only lead to significant overfitting issues but also exacerbate the notorious catastrophic forgetting problems. Moreover, as training data come in sequence in FSCIL, the learned classifier can only provide discriminative information in individual sessions, while FSCIL requires all classes to be involved for evaluation. In this paper, we address the FSCIL problem from two aspects. First, we adopt a simple but effective decoupled learning strategy of representations and classifiers that only the classifiers are updated in each incremental session, which avoids knowledge forgetting in the representations. By doing so, we demonstrate that a pre-trained backbone plus a non-parametric class mean classifier can beat state-of-the-art methods. Second, to make the classifiers learned on individual sessions applicable to all classes, we propose a Continually Evolved Classifier (CEC) that employs a graph model to propagate context information between classifiers for adaptation. To enable the learning of CEC, we design a pseudo incremental learning paradigm that episodically constructs a pseudo incremental learning task to optimize the graph parameters by sampling data from the base dataset. Experiments on three popular benchmark datas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01227

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FSCIL demands that the model retains previously acquired knowledge while continually incorporating new classes, all while dealing with constraints of limited annotated samples for each class.

    “This learning paradigm demands that the model retains previously acquired knowledge while continually incorporating new classes, all while dealing with the constraints of limited annotated samples for each class [12, 13, 14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Song, N., Lin, G., Zheng, Y., Pan, P., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Alibaba DAMO Academy (China) (CN)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
12450-12459
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177494822
Cited by
382
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 9
FWCI
25.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
Keywords
few-shot class-incremental learning, catastrophic forgetting, continual learning, overfitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review