Cited by 24Retinal Imaging and AnalysisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Retinal Disease Recognition

Zhang, Jinghua, Zhao, Peng, Zhao, Yongkun, Li, Chen, Hu, Dewen·2025·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (FSCIL) techniques are essential for developing Deep Learning (DL) models that can continuously learn new classes with limited samples while retaining existing knowledge. This capability is particularly crucial for DL-based retinal disease diagnosis system, where acquiring large annotated datasets is challenging, and disease phenotypes evolve over time. This paper introduces Re-FSCIL, a novel framework for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Retinal Disease Recognition (FSCIRDR). Re-FSCIL integrates the RETFound model with a fine-grained module, employing a forward-compatible training strategy to improve adaptability, supervised contrastive learning to enhance feature discrimination, and feature fusion for robust representation quality. We convert existing datasets into the FSCIL format and reproduce numerous representative FSCIL methods to create two new benchmarks, RFMiD38 and JSIEC39, specifically for FSCIRDR. Our experimental results demonstrate that Re-FSCIL achieves State-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, significantly surpassing existing FSCIL methods on these benchmarks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3457915

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. leveraged the RETFound foundation model to enhance feature learning in few-shot class-incremental retinal disease recognition.

    “Zhang et al. [117] leveraged the RETFound foundation model to enhance feature learning in few-shot class-incremental retinal disease recognition.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Zhao, P., Zhao, Y., Li, C., & Hu, D.
Affiliations
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Northeastern University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2025-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
9001-9012
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4402593546
Cited by
23
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62306323)
  • China Scholarship Council (202206110005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
few-shot class-incremental learning, retinal image classification, RETFound, supervised contrastive learning, feature fusion, benchmark dataset, continuous learning, medical image diagnosis
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Retina, Retinal Diseases, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review