Cited by 133Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysisSpeech and Audio Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DiffTalk: Crafting Diffusion Models for Generalized Audio-Driven Portraits Animation

Open access
Shen, Shuai, Zhao, Wenliang, Meng, Zibin, Li, Wanhua, Zhu, Zheng, Zhou, Jie, Lu, Jiwen·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Talking head synthesis is a promising approach for the video production industry. Recently, a lot of effort has been devoted in this research area to improve the generation quality or enhance the model generalization. However, there are few works able to address both issues simultaneously, which is essential for practical applications. To this end, in this paper, we turn attention to the emerging powerful Latent Diffusion Models, and model the Talking head generation as an audio-driven temporally coherent denoising process (DiffTalk). More specifically, instead of employing audio signals as the single driving factor, we investigate the control mechanism of the talking face, and incorporate reference face images and landmarks as conditions for personality-aware generalized synthesis. In this way, the proposed DiffTalk is capable of producing high-quality talking head videos in synchronization with the source audio, and more importantly, it can be naturally generalized across different identities without further finetuning. Additionally, our DiffTalk can be gracefully tailored for higher-resolution synthesis with negligible extra computational cost. Extensive experiments show that the proposed DiffTalk efficiently synthesizes high-fidelity audio-driven talking head videos for generalized novel identities. For more video results, please refer to https://sstzal.github.io/DiffTalk/.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00197

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–103 of 103

Metadata

Authors
Shen, S., Zhao, W., Meng, Z., Li, W., Zhu, Z., Zhou, J., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • PhiGent Robotics
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
1982-1991
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386075487
Cited by
133
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 9
FWCI
14.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0700802)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62125603)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
talking head synthesis, audio-driven video generation, latent diffusion models, facial landmarks, audio-video synchronization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review