Cited by 5,3513D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis

Mildenhall, Ben, Srinivasan, Pratul P., Tancik, Matthew, Barron, Jonathan T., Ramamoorthi, Ravi, Ng, Ren·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_24

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Tancik, M., Barron, J. T., Ramamoorthi, R., & Ng, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mildenhall, Ben
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
405-421
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3109585842
Cited by
5,351
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 703 · 2025: 1174 · 2024: 1361 · 2023: 1028 · 2022: 631 · 2021: 408 · 2020: 46
FWCI
469.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
neural radiance fields, view synthesis, novel view synthesis, scene representation, volume rendering, differentiable rendering, photorealistic rendering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review