Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning via Class-Aware Bilateral Distillation
Abstract
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (FSCIL) aims to continually learn novel classes based on only few training samples, which poses a more challenging task than the well-studied Class-Incremental Learning (CIL) due to data scarcity. While knowledge distillation, a prevailing technique in CIL, can alleviate the catastrophic forgetting of older classes by regularizing outputs between current and previous model, it fails to consider the overfitting risk of novel classes in FSCIL. To adapt the powerful distillation technique for FSCIL, we propose a novel distillation structure, by taking the unique challenge of overfitting into account. Concretely, we draw knowledge from two complementary teachers. One is the model trained on abundant data from base classes that carries rich general knowledge, which can be leveraged for easing the overfitting of current novel classes. The other is the updated model from last incremental session that contains the adapted knowledge of previous novel classes, which is used for alleviating their forgetting. To combine the guidances, an adaptive strategy conditioned on the class-wise semantic similarities is introduced. Besides, for better preserving base class knowledge when accommodating novel concepts, we adopt a two-branch network with an attention-based aggregation module to dynamically merge predictions from two complementary branches. Extensive experiments on 3 popular FSCIL datasets: mini-ImageNet, CIFAR100 and CUB200 validate the effectivenes…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional KD methods for continuous learning are prone to overfitting in the incremental session and further biases in future incremental sessions.
“Conventional KD methods for continuous learning are prone to overfitting in the incremental session and further biases in future incremental sessions [73].”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Zhao et al. [73] proposed a class-aware bilateral distillation framework, which consists of two branches: the base branch and the novel branch.
“Zhao et al. [73] proposed a class-aware bilateral distillation framework, which consists of two branches: the base branch and the novel branch.”
From Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114 · Cited by 7,899 · see citing works
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061 · see citing works
iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning
Rebuffi, S.-A., Kolesnikov, A., Sperl, G., & Lampert, C. H. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.587 · Cited by 3,988 · see citing works
Low-Shot Learning with Imprinted Weights
Qi, H., Brown, M., & Lowe, D. G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00610 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Classification and Object Detection: A Survey
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Silvén, O., Pietikäinen, M., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3529038 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“The role of attention modules used in many FSCIL approaches [14], [16], [17], [73], [74] is diverse.”
InfluentialFew-Shot Class-Incremental Learning for Retinal Disease Recognition
Zhang, J., Zhao, P., Zhao, Y., Li, C., & Hu, D. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3457915 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, L., Lu, J., Xu, Y., Cheng, Z., Guo, D., Niu, Y., & Fang, X.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Hikvision Research Institute
- Hikvision (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06
- Pages
- 11838-11847
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386057810
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- few-shot class-incremental learning, knowledge distillation, catastrophic forgetting, overfitting, attention-based aggregation, dual-branch network, continual learning, data scarcity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review