Cited by 49Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRadar Systems and Signal Processing

Towards Robust 3D Object Detection with LiDAR and 4D Radar Fusion in Various Weather Conditions

Chae, Yujeong, Kim, Hyeonseong, Yoon, Kuk-Jin·2024·2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Detecting objects in 3D under various (normal and adverse) weather conditions is essential for safe autonomous driving systems. Recent approaches have focused on employing weather-insensitive 4D radar sensors and leveraging them with other modalities, such as LiDAR. However, they fuse multi-modal information without considering the sensor characteristics and weather conditions, and lose some height information which could be useful for localizing 3D objects. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for robust LiDAR and 4D radar-based 3D object detection. Specifically, we propose a 3D-LRF module that considers the distinct patterns they exhibit in 3D space (e.g., precise 3D mapping of LiDAR and wide-range, weather-insensitive measurement of 4D radar) and extract fusion features based on their 3D spatial relationship. Then, our weather-conditional radar-flow gating network modulates the information flow of fusion features depending on weather conditions, and obtains enhanced feature that effectively incorporates the strength of two domains under various weather conditions. The extensive experiments demonstrate that our model achieves SoTA performance for 3D object detection under various weather conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01436

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goal-oriented navigation capability has been validated in Habitat's ObjectNav task, showing effective goal localisation in unknown environments.

    “This capability has been extensively validated in Habitat's ObjectNav task [108,109,17,110], demonstrating the effectiveness of achieving goal localisation in unknown environments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chae, Y., Kim, H., & Yoon, K.-J.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-16
Pages
15162-15172
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402727857
Cited by
49
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2
FWCI
27.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy
  • Defense Acquisition Program Administration (912768601)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF2022R1A2B5B03002636)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
Keywords
3D object detection, LiDAR, 4D radar, sensor fusion, weather robustness, adverse weather, autonomous driving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review