Cited by 18Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyData Management and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Track-Clustering Error Evaluation for Track-Based Multi-camera Tracking System Employing Human Re-identification

Wu, Chih-Wei, Zhong, Meng-Ting, Tsao, Yu, Yang, Shao-Wen, Chen, Yen-Kuang, Chien, Shao-Yi·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

In this study, we present a set of new evaluation measures for the track-based multi-camera tracking (T-MCT) task leveraging the clustering measurements. We demonstrate that the proposed evaluation measures provide notable advantages over previous ones. Moreover, a distributed and online T-MCT framework is proposed, where re-identification (Re-id) is embedded in T-MCT, to confirm the validity of the proposed evaluation measures. Experimental results reveal that with the proposed evaluation measures, the performance of T-MCT can be accurately measured, which is highly correlated to the performance of Re-id. Furthermore, it is also noted that our T-MCT framework achieves competitive score on the DukeMTMC dataset when compared to the previous work that used global optimization algorithms. Both the evaluation measures and the inter-camera tracking framework are proven to be the stepping stone for multi-camera tracking.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw.2017.184

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, C.-W., Zhong, M.-T., Tsao, Y., Yang, S.-W., Chen, Y.-K., & Chien, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Academia Sinica (TW)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
1416-1424
OpenAlex
W2740393196
Cited by
18
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
track clustering, evaluation metrics, person re-identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review