The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deepfakes Detection with Automatic Face Weighting
Open accessAbstract
Altered and manipulated multimedia is increasingly present and widely distributed via social media platforms. Advanced video manipulation tools enable the generation of highly realistic-looking altered multimedia. While many methods have been presented to detect manipulations, most of them fail when evaluated with data outside of the datasets used in research environments. In order to address this problem, the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) provides a large dataset of videos containing realistic manipulations and an evaluation system that ensures that methods work quickly and accurately, even when faced with challenging data. In this paper, we introduce a method based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that extracts visual and temporal features from faces present in videos to accurately detect manipulations. The method is evaluated with the DFDC dataset, providing competitive results compared to other techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The recent availability of large deepfake video databases allowed researchers to train and test detection approaches based on very deep neural networks, such as Xception [1], capsules networks [8], EfficientNet [2], and discriminators of GANs used to generate synthetic images [9], which were shown to outperform the methods based on shallow CNNs, facial physical characteristics [10], [11], [12], [1”
From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
GAN（Generative Adversarial Nets）
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition
Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N., & Zafeiriou, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00482 · Cited by 7,781
Self-citationJoint Face Detection and Alignment Using Multitask Cascaded Convolutional Networks
Zhang, K., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., & Qiao, Y. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2603342 · Cited by 6,214
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- bailey, 2016, Adobe Photoshop A Beginners Guide to Photoshop Lightroom - The 52 Photoshop Lightroom Tricks You Didn’t Know Existed!, 1
- barni, 2019, Copy move sourcetarget disambiguation through multi-branch cnns, arXiv preprint arXiv 1912 12640
- goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
- goodfellow, 2014, Generative adversarial nets, Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237
Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Rana, M. S., Nobi, M. N., Murali, B., & Sung, A. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3154404 · Cited by 573
Masood, M., Nawaz, M., Malik, K. M., Javed, A., Irtaza, A., & Malik, H. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z · Cited by 543
Combining EfficientNet and Vision Transformers for Video Deepfake Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Messina, N., Gennaro, C., & Falchi, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06433-3_19 · Cited by 296
A Survey on Deepfake Video Detection
Yu, P., Xia, Z., Fei, J., & Lu, Y. (2021) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/bme2.12031 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Montserrat, D. M., Hao, H., Yarlagadda, S. K., Baireddy, S., Shao, R., Horvath, J., Bartusiak, E., Yang, J., Guera, D., Zhu, F., & Delp, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-06
- Pages
- 2851-2859
- OpenAlex
- W3020392129
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, video manipulation, DFDC, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, temporal features, visual features, social media misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
