Cited by 46Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Peer-to-Peer Federated Continual Learning for Naturalistic Driving Action Recognition

Open access
Yuan, Liangqi, Ma, Yunsheng, Su, Lu, Wang, Ziran·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Naturalistic driving action recognition (NDAR) has proven to be an effective method for detecting driver distraction and reducing the risk of traffic accidents. However, the intrusive design of in-cabin cameras raises concerns about driver privacy. To address this issue, we propose a novel peer-to-peer (P2P) federated learning (FL) framework with continual learning, namely FedPC, which ensures privacy and enhances learning efficiency while reducing communication, computational, and storage overheads. Our framework focuses on addressing the clients’ objectives within a serverless FL framework, with the goal of delivering personalized and accurate NDAR models. We demonstrate and evaluate the performance of FedPC on two real-world NDAR datasets, including the State Farm Distracted Driver Detection and Track 3 NDAR dataset in the 2023 AICity Challenge. The results of our experiments highlight the strong competitiveness of FedPC compared to the conventional client-to-server (C2S) FLs in terms of performance, knowledge dissemination rate, and compatibility with new clients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00553

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advances such as a DFL framework and gossip protocols in [168] can improve model training in dynamic multi-user environments like passenger monitoring in public transit.

    “Additionally, advances like DFL framework and gossip protocols in [168], can improve model training in dynamic multi-user environments like passenger monitoring in public transit.”

    From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [168]

    Section 3.2 describes FedPC’s gossip protocol as a way to handle dynamic vehicle connections, and the Conclusion reports rapid knowledge dissemination on driving-action datasets (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not study passenger monitoring in public transit, so the claimed benefit in that setting is an extrapolation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yacine Belal, Aurélien Bellet, Sonia Ben Mokhtar, and Vlad Nitu. Pepper: Empowering user-centric recommender sys- tems over gossip learning. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wear- able Ubiquitous Technol., 6(3):1-27, 2022.
  2. Alysa Ziying Tan, Han Yu, Lizhen Cui, and Qiang Yang. To- wards personalized federated learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 2022. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, L., Ma, Y., Su, L., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Purdue University,West Lafayette,USA
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06
Pages
5250-5259
OpenAlex
W4385815544
Cited by
45
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
peer-to-peer federated learning, continual learning, driver distraction detection, driver privacy, personalized models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review