Prediction modelling in career management
Abstract
A question that is often arose on career management is how to choose potential employees to become chief and achieve performance target based on employees' historical data. This research attempts to answer the question and tries to determine what factors can affect an employee to become a chief and capable to achieve performance target. To address the question, this study adopts predictive modelling approach using classification techniques and kl-divergence function. The research proposes some recommendations based on applied algorithm. Additionally, the study shows it is easier to choose a chief based on their historical data compare to predicting which employee can perform well in the future or predicting both potential chief and high performer employees. If organization wants to select potential employees to become chief and predicts them achieving their target, classification techniques should include all employees as the population and avoid to choose only subsets to ensure the confidence of result. Meanwhile, KL-Divergence function generates competencies that affect employee who become a chief and achieve the target. They are achievement orientation, adaptability, analytical thinking, communication and information seeking.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forecasted performance is often used to promote employees to managerial positions.
“This forecasted performance is often used as the basis to set future goals or expectations (Angrave et al., 2016;Edwards & Edwards, 2019), to estimate the training needs (Horesh, Varshney, & Yi, 2016), to determine pay raise (Greenfield, 2018) or to promote employees to managerial positions (Mallafi & Widyantoro, 2016).”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Mallafi & Widyantoro, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mallafi, H., & Widyantoro, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
- ORCID
- Widyantoro, Dwi H.
- Venue
- 2016 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 17-21
- OpenAlex
- W2604191081
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- career management, leadership potential, job performance prediction, predictive modeling, classification methods, Kullback-Leibler divergence, employee competence, achievement orientation, adaptability, analytical thinking, communication skills, information seeking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review