Cited by 7AI and HR TechnologiesData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsOnline Learning and Analytics

Prediction modelling in career management

Mallafi, Hadary, Widyantoro, Dwi H.·2016·2016 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics

Abstract

A question that is often arose on career management is how to choose potential employees to become chief and achieve performance target based on employees' historical data. This research attempts to answer the question and tries to determine what factors can affect an employee to become a chief and capable to achieve performance target. To address the question, this study adopts predictive modelling approach using classification techniques and kl-divergence function. The research proposes some recommendations based on applied algorithm. Additionally, the study shows it is easier to choose a chief based on their historical data compare to predicting which employee can perform well in the future or predicting both potential chief and high performer employees. If organization wants to select potential employees to become chief and predicts them achieving their target, classification techniques should include all employees as the population and avoid to choose only subsets to ensure the confidence of result. Meanwhile, KL-Divergence function generates competencies that affect employee who become a chief and achieve the target. They are achievement orientation, adaptability, analytical thinking, communication and information seeking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cyberneticscom.2016.7892560

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forecasted performance is often used to promote employees to managerial positions.

    “This forecasted performance is often used as the basis to set future goals or expectations (Angrave et al., 2016;Edwards & Edwards, 2019), to estimate the training needs (Horesh, Varshney, & Yi, 2016), to determine pay raise (Greenfield, 2018) or to promote employees to managerial positions (Mallafi & Widyantoro, 2016).”

    From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Mallafi & Widyantoro, 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallafi, H., & Widyantoro, D. H.
Affiliations
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
Venue
2016 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016
Pages
17-21
OpenAlex
W2604191081
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
career management, leadership potential, job performance prediction, predictive modeling, classification methods, Kullback-Leibler divergence, employee competence, achievement orientation, adaptability, analytical thinking, communication skills, information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review