The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Ordering Service for the Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform
Open accessAbstract
Hyperledger Fabric is a flexible operating system for permissioned blockchains designed for business applications beyond the basic digital coin addressed by Bitcoin and other existing networks. A key property of this system is its extensibility, and in particular the support for multiple ordering services for building the blockchain. However, version 1 was launched in 2017 without an implementation of a Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) ordering service. To overcome this limitation, we designed, implemented, and evaluated a BFT ordering service for this system on top of the BFT-SMART state machine replication/consensus library, with optimizations for wide-area deployment. Our results show that our ordering service can process up to ten thousand transactions per second and write a transaction irrevocably in the blockchain in half a second, even with peers spread across different continents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/571637.571640 · Cited by 2,475
The Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication
Vukolić, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citation
Cited by
Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains
Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., Manevich, Y., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference · doi:10.1145/3190508.3190538 · Cited by 3,654
Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains
Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., Manevich, Y., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.10228 · Cited by 499
Blockchain technology: A survey on applications and security privacy Challenges
Mohanta, B. K., Jena, D., Panda, S. S., & Sobhanayak, S. (2019) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2019.100107 · Cited by 394
A review of secure and privacy-preserving medical data sharing
Jin, H., Luo, Y., Li, P., & Mathew, J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2916503 · Cited by 293
Performance Modeling of Hyperledger Fabric (Permissioned Blockchain Network)
Sukhwani, H., Wang, N., Trivedi, K. S., & Rindos, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) · doi:10.1109/nca.2018.8548070 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa, J., Bessani, A., & Vukolic, M.
- Venue
- 2018 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-06
- Pages
- 51-58
- OpenAlex
- W2758139288
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Ordering Service for the Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/dsn.2018.00018
- The paper
- Sousa, J., Bessani, A., & Vukolic, M. (2018). A Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Ordering Service for the Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform. 2018 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN). https://doi.org/10.1109/dsn.2018.00018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
