The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fog computing based efficient IoT scheme for the Industry 4.0
Abstract
Industry 4.0 aims to dramatically enhance the productivity of manufacturing technologies through the collection and analysis of real-time data. This combines the ubiquity of the IoT with the processing capabilities of cloud computing to generate insights that help to optimize the decision making process. The increasing demand of data and the explosion in the number of sensing devices, which might be highly constrained in terms of communication, battery and computational power, introduce new challenges that need efficient IoT-Cloud architectures. With this in mind, we extend MQTT, the de facto IoT communication protocol, using a fog computing approach that introduces a low complexity computational layer between the Cloud and IoT nodes. In this approach, the MQTT broker, which is in charge of relaying data from publishers to subscribers, is placed at the fog layer. The purpose of introducing an intermediate layer to this particular scenario is to: i) predict future data measurements through prediction techniques; ii) operate as a gateway to upper layers; and iii) provide the capability to offload computationally expensive data processing jobs from the Cloud to the Fog, minimizing additional latency and operational expenses. With this architecture, the transmissions required from IoT devices may be reduced, since the publishers would only need to update the predicted data in case of mismatching. We validate our approach with an energy consumption analysis and simulations of different Machine Learning algorithms on a real dataset, and compare it with the traditional MQTT scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., & Bormann, C. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7252 · Cited by 2,605 · cited 1×
“Due to the above, lightweight application layer protocols, such as MQ Telemetry Transport (MQTT) [9] and Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) [10], are gaining momentum.”
Fog Computing: Platform and Applications
Yi, S., Hao, Z., Qin, Z., & Li, Q. (2015) · 2015 Third IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb) · doi:10.1109/hotweb.2015.22 · Cited by 829
Cited by
Fog Computing and the Internet of Things: A Review
Atlam, H., Walters, R., & Wills, G. (2018) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc2020010 · Cited by 608
Fog computing for Healthcare 4.0 environment: Opportunities and challenges
Kumari, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2018) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.08.015 · Cited by 503
Fog/Edge Computing-Based IoT (FECIoT): Architecture, Applications, and Research Issues
Omoniwa, B., Hussain, R., Javed, M. A., Bouk, S. H., & Malik, S. A. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2875544 · Cited by 284
Suárez-Albela, M., Fernández-Caramés, T., Fraga-Lamas, P., & Castedo, L. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17091978 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Peralta, G., Iglesias-Urkia, M., Barcelo, M., Gomez, R., Moran, A., & Bilbao, J.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-05
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2626046334
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fog computing based efficient IoT scheme for the Industry 4.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ecmsm.2017.7945879
- The paper
- Peralta, G., Iglesias-Urkia, M., Barcelo, M., Gomez, R., Moran, A., & Bilbao, J. (2017). Fog computing based efficient IoT scheme for the Industry 4.0. 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM). https://doi.org/10.1109/ecmsm.2017.7945879
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.