Methods of deepfake detection based on machine learning
Abstract
Nowadays, people faced an emerging problem of AI-synthesized face swapping videos, widely known as the DeepFakes. This kind of videos can be created to cause threats to privacy, fraudulence and so on. Sometimes good quality DeepFake videos recognition could be hard to distinguish with people eyes. That's why researchers need to develop algorithms to detect them. In this work, we present overview of indicators that can tell us about the fact that face swapping algorithms were used on photos. Main purpose of this paper is to find algorithm or technology that can decide whether photo was changed with DeepFake technology or not with good accuracy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML models frequently provide interpretability, enabling practitioners to comprehend the specific features contributing to the model's decision-making, and this transparency can facilitate identification of the cues the model depends on to differentiate authentic and counterfeit content.
“ML models frequently provide interpretability, enabling practitioners to comprehend the specific features contributing to the model's decision-making process. This level of transparency can facilitate the identification of the cues that the model depends on to differentiate between authentic and counterfeit content (Maksutov etal. 2020).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al. 2020
Synthetic media are much more appealing and lifelike, with broad applications, making protection from them significantly more difficult.
“These media are also much more appealing and lifelike, with broad applications in a variety of contexts, all of which make protection from them significantly more difficult (Maksutov et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
The presence of visible or nonverbal clues for evaluating information has become diminished or nonexistent due to recent technological breakthroughs, heightening marketplace deception to unprecedented levels.
“The presence of visible or nonverbal clues (e.g., facial expressions, eye contact) for evaluating a piece of information has become diminished or even nonexistent as a result of recent technological breakthroughs (Maksutov et al., 2020; Ramadhani & Munir, 2020; Tong et al., 2020), thus heightening the degree of marketplace deception to unprecedented levels (Ho et al., 2016; Taylor, 2021).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
In a machine-versus-machine scenario, the whole detection method becomes obsolete.
“In this machine-versus-machine scenario, the whole detection method then becomes obsolete (Maksutov et al., 2020; Ramadhani & Munir, 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
Addressing the surge of algorithm-generated misinformation opens up a new field of business for developing AI-based solutions and services that detect synthetic content from human-generated content and provide consumers with warnings when confronted with marketplace deception or suspicious content.
“Addressing the surge of algorithm-generated misinformation opens up a new field of business for developing AI-based solutions and services that detect synthetic content from human-generated content and provide consumers with warnings when confronted with marketplace deception or suspicious content (Maksutov et al., 2020; Torres et al., 2018; Zotov et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
Deepfakes are highly realistic synthetic media generated by algorithms and typically distributed as social media content.
“Deepfakes are highly realistic synthetic media generated by algorithms (Chesney & Citron, 2019; Maksutov et al., 2020) and typically distributed as social media content.”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
Most studies have perceived deepfakes as a grave danger.
“Moreover, most studies have perceived deepfakes as a grave danger (e.g., Giansiracusa, 2021; Graham et al., 2021; Maksutov et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
The current knowledge on deepfakes is scant and diffuse.
“The current knowledge on deepfakes is scant and diffuse (Maksutov et al., 2020; Zotov et al., 2020).”
From Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as Maksutov et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Maksutov, A. A., Morozov, V. O., Lavrenov, A. A., & Smirnov, A. S.
- Affiliations
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (RU)
- ORCID
- Maksutov, Artem A.
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-01
- Pages
- 408-411
- OpenAlex
- W3012455256
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, face swapping, synthetic media, machine learning, video forensics, privacy risks, fraud detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review