Smartphone-based evaluation of parkinsonian hand tremor: Quantitative measurements vs clinical assessment scores
Abstract
With an ever-growing number of technologically advanced methods for the diagnosis and quantification of movement disorders, comes the need to assess their accuracy and see how they match up with widely used standard clinical assessment tools. This work compares quantitative measurements of hand tremor in twenty-three Parkinson's disease patients, with their clinical scores in the hand tremor components of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), which is considered the "gold standard" in the clinical assessment of the disease. Our measurements were obtained using a smartphone-based platform, which processes the phone's accelerometer and gyroscope signals to detect and measure hand tremor. The signal metrics used were mainly based on the magnitude of the acceleration and the rotation rate vectors of the device. Our results suggest relatively strong correlation (r>0.7 and p<;0.01) between the patients' UPDRS hand tremor scores and the signal metrics applied to the measured signals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown that smartphone accelerometers are comparable to laboratory accelerometers in the assessment and classification of tremors.
“In fact, previous studies have shown that smartphone accelerometers are comparable to laboratory accelerometers in the assessment and classification of tremors [6–10]”
From Differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease and essential tremor using the smartphone's accelerometer (2017) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Kostikis, N., Hristu-Varsakelis, D., Arnaoutoglou, M., & Kotsavasiloglou, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Macedonia (GR)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- Venue
- 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 2014
- Pages
- 906-909
- ISSN
- 2375-7477 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319044083
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, hand tremor, accelerometer, gyroscope, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, tremor quantification, movement disorders
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Hand, Humans, Parkinson Disease, Severity of Illness Index, Tremor, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review